phpBB • Free and Open Source Forum Software

Perhaps it is important to say that there are forums in the wild that contain content in addition to discussion and not just discussion. Some things do not need to be discussed, but ratings are helpful. In addition, it does not always have to be negative when there are fewer soulless "LOL"...

Could the phpBB-Team start a crowdfunding for this? I think we only need 24 hours after a massmail to all phpBB-members to get the needed money - no matter how high the costs are. I would pay 50 Euro directly and if necessary would double it.

Big sorry for the confusion! Everything is fine with this. I did not verify the screenshot from noth and had not installed the extension for myself, sorry again.
https://www.phpbb.com/customise/db/styl ... 66#p531166

This version does not use a font-awesome-icon in the navbar. It would be a great benefit for other styles if you do so. At present you are only compatible to prosilver and other "white" styles. For compatibility to dark styles your extension has to provide a dark icon to be compatible. Its...

It would be great, if you use a awesome-font icon in your extension for better compatibilty with 3.2 styles.
https://www.phpbb.com/customise/db/styl ... 66#p531166

It would be great, if you use a awesome-font icon in your extension for better compatibilty with 3.2 styles.
https://www.phpbb.com/customise/db/styl ... 66#p531166

I ported my style ne-blackgreen to phpBB 3.2.0
Live-Demo: https://www.nachtelb.de
Its a blackgreen theme for prosilver without changes to the template.
You could download it from my github: https://github.com/nachtelb/phpbb_prosi ... lackgreen/

Hello nomad,
the problem is your Typing-Box-Addon. This overwrites my background-colour but it is not overwriting my text-colour. https://www.phpbb.com/customise/db/styl ... pic/157466

Hello nomad666, from 3.1.7 to 3.1.8 only the template-files got some changes. So this shouldn't be the problem for a css-error. I use this style on my own board and i dont find problems. Do you have the latest version from the style-database? Could you describe which typing-box you mean? The box for...

Yes, i meant it would be interesting to know those valid reasons. I for myself found those possible reasons: The support-Team should not get more work with complaints about "job done - no money received" or "money given - no work done" or "money given - job is not finished&q...

I could accept the situation because the decision is done by the leaders. Thats it. The weakness of the rule is, that it obviously lacks on arguments, because the referral to a rule is not a argument. But its the right of a group of leaders/makers to build rules without argument.

The work-in-Progress-Version of this request is functional but not finalized.
https://github.com/nachtelb/RecentTopic ... nt-in-tabs
Demo: my website (see profile)

But a public Extension done by the "contractor" is not my own project. Its a public project - everybody could benefit from the result. I would pay for open source. - I do not understand what it is to be spam.

Thank you for the hint with the signatures.

Thank you for the answer! I didn't understood that this falls under "solicitation". I suggest to discuss the use of this rule for payed Extensions (phpbb-team-internally)! When i'am willing to invest a bit of my money into bringing something further for me and phpBB, i dont understand wher...

Is it allowed to request an Extension (as a "community-release" under GNU) and offering a Payment to the extension-Author?