Search found 152 matches

by gn#36
Tue Dec 26, 2017 10:38 pm
Forum: Extension Writers Discussion
Topic: Is there an API?
Replies: 14
Views: 2879

Re: Is there an API?

For better debugging, creation_time should be simply a unix timestamp. Also make sure your script is using the same transfer method as the form for each parameter. The function checks explicitly, whether they are sent via POST, not GET. If you are interested, how the form check is added to the form,...
by gn#36
Tue Dec 26, 2017 8:32 pm
Forum: Extension Writers Discussion
Topic: Is there an API?
Replies: 14
Views: 2879

Re: Is there an API?

If you want to stick to your login based approach (e.g. because you are posting from a different server), you should take a look at the code locations where this message is output: https://github.com/phpbb/phpbb/search?q=%27FORM_INVALID%27&type=&utf8=%E2%9C%93 Possible reasons for this message durin...
by gn#36
Sun Aug 06, 2017 3:01 pm
Forum: Extensions in Development
Topic: [3.2][BETA] [3.1] gn36 - Hookup
Replies: 41
Views: 7054

Re: [3.2][BETA] [3.1] gn36 - Hookup

i don't know if somebody mention this or not but there is problem with Text entries order the order always change after refreshing the page Can you clarify? I don't see a random change of order of text entries. Also, what database do you use? Mysql? also should every user see his name first I am no...
by gn#36
Wed Jun 14, 2017 10:20 am
Forum: Extensions in Development
Topic: [3.2][BETA] [3.1] gn36 - Hookup
Replies: 41
Views: 7054

Re: [CDB] [3.1] [3.2] gn36 - Hookup

The only thing which may could be better is the summary line, which isn't readable in all cases. https://imgur.com/a/NSdPb Yeah, I guess with large numbers of participants the percentages get fairly small. Maybe I should introduce some minimum widths. // edit: It seems the ext is expecting the hook...
by gn#36
Tue Jun 13, 2017 7:32 pm
Forum: Extensions in Development
Topic: [3.2][BETA] [3.1] gn36 - Hookup
Replies: 41
Views: 7054

Re: [CDB] [3.1] [3.2] gn36 - Hookup

Hi zorni, no you haven't missed that option. There is currently only one permission controlling what users can or cannot do. They can either use the full planner or cannot use it at all. Only the starter of a thread and moderators have the permission to invite new usergroups, though. A regular parti...
by gn#36
Mon Jun 12, 2017 3:44 pm
Forum: Extensions in Development
Topic: [3.2][BETA] [3.1] gn36 - Hookup
Replies: 41
Views: 7054

Re: [RC] gn36 - Hookup

Thank you.

I will now re-use this topic for the update to phpBB 3.2 as well as the development of further features as suggested in the enhancement list.

You can already find a first beta release for 3.2 here.
by gn#36
Mon Mar 13, 2017 8:55 pm
Forum: Extensions in Development
Topic: [3.2][BETA] [3.1] gn36 - Hookup
Replies: 41
Views: 7054

Re: [RC] gn36 - Hookup

Ah very interesting. I never tried using the hookup with an RTL language. I guess the "dumb" old JS calendar was better for this case. I don't have an Arabic translation for this extension. Can you provide the translation of the extension you used so I can actually reproduce what happens? Are the te...
by gn#36
Sun Mar 05, 2017 3:21 pm
Forum: Extensions in Development
Topic: [3.2][BETA] [3.1] gn36 - Hookup
Replies: 41
Views: 7054

Re: [RC] gn36 - Hookup

Did you get errors during installation? This error sounds like the installation was incomplete. Did you do an upgrade from 3.0 with an existing hookup inside the forum? If so, what kind of database cleanup did you run before or after upgrading to 3.1? The table this error reports is identical betwee...
by gn#36
Sat Mar 04, 2017 4:34 pm
Forum: Extensions in Development
Topic: [3.2][BETA] [3.1] gn36 - Hookup
Replies: 41
Views: 7054

Re: [RC] gn36 - Hookup

Please use the complete package from here: https://github.com/gn36/phpbb-ext-hookup/releases

The zip file (gn36-hookup-1.0.2.zip) contains the missing dependencies, the "source code (zip)" does not.

Alternatively, you can install the dependencies yourself by running composer install.
by gn#36
Tue Feb 21, 2017 11:21 pm
Forum: Extension Writers Discussion
Topic: Migration: set group forum permission to Yes by default
Replies: 11
Views: 750

Re: Migration: set group forum permission to Yes by default

I don't know of any "best practices". Usually, I would try to find an existing permission that covers a roughly similar behavior and just copy that. In most cases, I would think that this will lead to a roughly expected behavior, if the reference permission is similar enough. For example, if your ex...
by gn#36
Fri Jan 27, 2017 9:42 pm
Forum: Extensions in Development
Topic: [3.2][BETA] [3.1] gn36 - Hookup
Replies: 41
Views: 7054

Re: [ALPHA] gn36 - Hookup

Yes. It will take a while though. I am first finalizing the changes requested from the Extensions Team here to get it into the db for 3.1, then I will make the necessary changes for 3.2. I will have to rework the notifications to make them compatible with 3.2. Everything else should work, but even w...
by gn#36
Fri Nov 18, 2016 4:57 pm
Forum: Extension Writers Discussion
Topic: permission cache storage
Replies: 10
Views: 711

Re: permission cache storage

As a matter of fact I tought the best way to do that is to extend the auth class with a Service replacement . The "same method" is named and used in 3.2.x as Service decoration . If changes to auth are necessary and must be used in core parts, then agree. But if the permissions are separate from fo...
by gn#36
Fri Nov 18, 2016 7:27 am
Forum: Extension Writers Discussion
Topic: permission cache storage
Replies: 10
Views: 711

Re: permission cache storage

Several years ago, I have done something similar for phpBB 3.0. I wanted to have separate permissions for some pages inside my mod that had nothing to do with forums. The mod is no longer used and I never created separate install instructions, but if I invest a bit of time I am fairly sure I can fin...
by gn#36
Tue Oct 11, 2016 6:23 pm
Forum: Extension Writers Discussion
Topic: InnoDB - Foreign Key Constraints?
Replies: 5
Views: 431

Re: InnoDB - Foreign Key Constraints?

The trouble with this would be that the forum software can always only use the features that are supported by all database backends unless there is a way to emulate the behavior for the remainder of the backends. I guess most database backends nowadays support some sort of referential integrity by u...
by gn#36
Sun Oct 09, 2016 2:36 pm
Forum: Extension Writers Discussion
Topic: InnoDB - Foreign Key Constraints?
Replies: 5
Views: 431

Re: InnoDB - Foreign Key Constraints?

phpBB can use innodb tables. My local installation for testing purposes has nothing but innodb tables. phpBB supports transactions as well, so you can use rollbacks as well. You can have a look into the phpbb/db/ folder to see how it handles the database (especially check the tools.php file for tabl...

Go to advanced search