How do you know what is "intended"?Heo32 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 01, 2018 4:59 pmAt the moment, it just doesn't seem right to have a link respond with google.com (<- go on, click it) when clearly https://www.google.com/ was the intended URL.
How do you know what is "intended"?Heo32 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 01, 2018 4:59 pmAt the moment, it just doesn't seem right to have a link respond with google.com (<- go on, click it) when clearly https://www.google.com/ was the intended URL.
Editing is technically handled as posting, if you can't post without approval you can't edit without approval. See that forum.t_backoff wrote:EDITING? I know POSTING requires approval.
Permissions can quite easily be used to achieve that, it's already be done in announcements that way .Marshalrusty wrote:We also definitely don't want article authors to have unchecked ability to edit things without someone verifying their accuracy
includes/message_parser.php
and includes/bbcode.php
are involved.