Search found 517 matches

by GoBieN
Thu Nov 19, 2015 8:06 pm
Forum: Abandoned Extensions
Topic: [ABD] XML Sitemap
Replies: 22
Views: 5081

Re: [DEV] XML Sitemap

Ok thanks.
And if Google downloads it, it will see the forums accessible for bots then I guess.
by GoBieN
Wed Nov 18, 2015 6:57 pm
Forum: Abandoned Extensions
Topic: [ABD] XML Sitemap
Replies: 22
Views: 5081

Re: [DEV] XML Sitemap

Does the sitemap only include public readable forums, or can you exclude the admin forum in the sitemap?
by GoBieN
Wed Nov 18, 2015 6:38 pm
Forum: Extensions in Development
Topic: [BETA] StopForumSpam Report
Replies: 15
Views: 1118

Re: [BETA] StopForumSpam Report

Maybe change the extension so that you can only report a user based on a spam post?
The API allows to send over proof in the form of a spam post.
by GoBieN
Wed Nov 18, 2015 5:58 pm
Forum: Extensions in Development
Topic: [3.2][BETA] Custom Code
Replies: 766
Views: 75906

Re: [RC] Custom Code

I'm confused, I updated a testforum to 3.1.6 (from 3.1.5) and all the customcode is still working it seems.
I did clear the cache.
by GoBieN
Wed Nov 11, 2015 9:38 am
Forum: Extensions in Development
Topic: [CDB] mChat
Replies: 1466
Views: 157277

Re: [DEV] mChat

Not a fix but a workaround
by GoBieN
Mon Nov 02, 2015 7:01 pm
Forum: Extensions in Development
Topic: [CDB] mChat
Replies: 1466
Views: 157277

Re: [DEV] mChat

To upgrade a board with mods it's better to use the STK (Support ToolKit) Database cleaner tool, this will delete all tables and extra fields in the database that are not default. Also replace your files with clean 3.0.14 files (except config.php, /files and /images). But make sure you make backups ...
by GoBieN
Mon Oct 19, 2015 4:39 pm
Forum: Extensions in Development
Topic: [CDB] mChat
Replies: 1466
Views: 157277

Re: [DEV] mChat

Before upgrading to 3.1 you should have deleted any custom UCP/ACP modules. That's probably a leftover module from the 3.0 mod. In the 3.1 extensions there are no files to be placed or modified in the core (includes is a core directory).
by GoBieN
Mon Oct 19, 2015 4:36 pm
Forum: Extensions in Development
Topic: [RC] phpBB Gallery
Replies: 1267
Views: 98300

Re: [BETA] phpBB Gallery

@john conner:
I think you need to create an album/gallery first an assign permissions.

@Joyce&Luna:
No idea what you mean by posting these rewrite rules that forward non-www to www or vice versa.
by GoBieN
Sun Oct 04, 2015 8:45 pm
Forum: Extensions in Development
Topic: [CDB] mChat
Replies: 1466
Views: 157277

Re: [DEV] mChat

It has been said that turning on the server rewrite option in the ACP fixes this. I can't test because I'm not using apache. Here are my Nginx rewrite rules: #FIX MCHAT AJAX BASE DIR rewrite ^/memberlist.php /forum/memberlist.php permanent; rewrite ^/download/file.php /forum/download/file.php perman...
by GoBieN
Sun Oct 04, 2015 8:39 pm
Forum: Extensions in Development
Topic: [CDB] mChat
Replies: 1466
Views: 157277

Re: [DEV] mChat

Check a few pages back, bug in AJAX code. Only occurs when forum is in subfolder (like /forum/).
Workaround, use rewrite rules.
by GoBieN
Sat Oct 03, 2015 6:10 pm
Forum: Extensions in Development
Topic: [3.2][BETA] Custom Code
Replies: 766
Views: 75906

Re: [RC] Custom Code

Maybe it's an option to add a file editor to the insert template code extension? This file editor would just allow you to edit and save every template file that is present in the folder?
by GoBieN
Thu Sep 17, 2015 5:01 pm
Forum: Extensions in Development
Topic: [3.2][BETA] Custom Code
Replies: 766
Views: 75906

Re: [RC] Custom Code

I won't be updating to 3.1.6 on my two board because of this.

We can't do without, I'd rather wait then trying the workarounds.
by GoBieN
Tue Sep 15, 2015 8:11 pm
Forum: Extensions in Development
Topic: [DEV] Post Love
Replies: 726
Views: 100006

Re: [BETA] Post Love

I don't agree, it's the specific post you like, not the user, so I think it's better in the post field.
by GoBieN
Mon Aug 31, 2015 4:35 pm
Forum: [3.0.x] Support Forum
Topic: Limited SSL Usage in phpBB3
Replies: 56
Views: 12543

Re: Limited SSL Usage in phpBB3

Does this hook still work with phpBB 3.1?
by GoBieN
Tue Aug 18, 2015 7:34 pm
Forum: phpBB Discussion
Topic: [UnSolved] Problems with SEO
Replies: 28
Views: 1452

Re: [UnSolved] Problems with SEO

The point is that they did not. Whatever html code that search engines see here is the same code that is in the standard phpBB package. That's not completely true. First of all phpbb.com uses more html header than the standard package: <meta name="application-name" content="phpBB" /> <meta name="ms...

Go to advanced search