Search found 91 matches

by LukeWCS
Sun May 05, 2019 4:50 pm
Forum: Extension Writers Discussion
Topic: version check error from ACP
Replies: 18
Views: 900

Re: version check error from ACP

Hi If I remember correctly, it doen't work if you use the GitHub repository directly, or at least it didn't work for me back then. It works, if you use the subdomain raw. and with a small change in the URL. My LFWWH ext demonstrates how this works. @Meis2M Your file is on a server with SSL, so you n...
by LukeWCS
Thu May 02, 2019 8:39 pm
Forum: Extensions in Development
Topic: [BETA] [3.1][3.2] LF who was here (2.x)
Replies: 34
Views: 2999

Re: [3.2][BETA] LF who was here (2.x)

@Siava

Please be more precisely: which settings wasn't imported?
by LukeWCS
Wed May 01, 2019 8:10 pm
Forum: Extension Writers Discussion
Topic: Some questions and bugs regarding EPV
Replies: 13
Views: 650

Re: Some questions and bugs regarding EPV

Okay, then a PR. But what's about "symfony"? I don't know what's meant with that. I only done the following: 1. Downloaded and extracted EPV. 2. Executed php src/EPV.php . Then EPV wrote: "Composer autoloading seems to be missing. Did you run composer.phar install?" 3. Executed php composer.phar ins...
by LukeWCS
Wed May 01, 2019 7:26 pm
Forum: Extensions in Development
Topic: [BETA] [3.1][3.2] LF who was here (2.x)
Replies: 34
Views: 2999

Re: [3.2][BETA] LF who was here (2.x)

Um... the permissions will not be imported, but the settings should. The settings wasn't imported?
by LukeWCS
Wed May 01, 2019 7:17 pm
Forum: Extension Writers Discussion
Topic: Some questions and bugs regarding EPV
Replies: 13
Views: 650

Re: Some questions and bugs regarding EPV

Ah, okay, in that case: what do you prefer? As Issue or as PR?

But that would only be for 1. What is with 2.? The vendor structure is created by composer.phar install. And there is the second "bug" present, regarding "it seems the local EPV doesn't check services.yml".
by LukeWCS
Wed May 01, 2019 3:58 pm
Forum: Extension Writers Discussion
Topic: Some questions and bugs regarding EPV
Replies: 13
Views: 650

Re: Some questions and bugs regarding EPV

I solved the problems by myself. 1. Language files (EPV structure): the language files are not checked because there is a RegEx that supports only Unix but not Windows. I changed the RegEx to support both systems. 2. services.yml (vendor structure): the code line for the relevant error message is di...
by LukeWCS
Tue Apr 30, 2019 10:48 pm
Forum: Extensions in Development
Topic: [BETA] [3.1][3.2] LF who was here (2.x)
Replies: 34
Views: 2999

Re: [3.2][BETA] LF who was here (2.x)

Ah, there's the man who lets LFWWH work so hard. :mrgreen: I successfully updated from 1.5.1 to 2.0 beta2. So did automatic data import work properly in your case? This is a very interessting point to me, because on your board you have a big WWH table in your database. 2.0 is much better in performa...
by LukeWCS
Mon Apr 29, 2019 10:00 am
Forum: Extensions in Development
Topic: [BETA] [3.1][3.2] LF who was here (2.x)
Replies: 34
Views: 2999

Re: [3.2][BETA] LF who was here (2.x)

@stefan-franz

Alright, thanks for your feedback.
by LukeWCS
Sun Apr 28, 2019 8:49 pm
Forum: Extensions in Development
Topic: [BETA] [3.1][3.2] LF who was here (2.x)
Replies: 34
Views: 2999

Re: [3.2][BETA] LF who was here (2.x)

beta2 (build 31) online now.

ACP screenshot updated.
by LukeWCS
Mon Apr 22, 2019 12:08 pm
Forum: Extension Writers Discussion
Topic: Some questions and bugs regarding EPV
Replies: 13
Views: 650

Re: Some questions and bugs regarding EPV

Okay, no problem. This is not a time-critical problem. ^^ After you wrote something about --debug I tried that. Maybe it can help you: Running Extension Pre Validator on directory .. Running tests. Validation: FAILED Fatal: 0, Error: 0, Warning: 2, Notice: 0 Found G:\programme\wamp\www\epv\src\Tests...
by LukeWCS
Mon Apr 22, 2019 10:07 am
Forum: Extension Writers Discussion
Topic: Some questions and bugs regarding EPV
Replies: 13
Views: 650

Re: Some questions and bugs regarding EPV

Well, if you use the latest version of EPV, the language items should at least be shown. Yes it should , but it isn't. Make sure that the version is up to date. The latest commit is ef657d8, It is up to date. After I reported the PCRE bug (#86) and after kasimi fixed it (#87) I downloaded EPV again...
by LukeWCS
Sun Apr 21, 2019 3:57 pm
Forum: Extension Writers Discussion
Topic: Some questions and bugs regarding EPV
Replies: 13
Views: 650

Re: Some questions and bugs regarding EPV

@AbaddonOrmuz Thanks for your answer. To 1: I know this section of documentation, but thanks nevertheless. Well, this is simply too complicated for me and a day have only 24 hours. ^^ I prefer EPV. To 2: Thanks. @Paul Thanks Paul Point 2 fixed now. ;) Tested with my own ext which uses already "GPL-2...
by LukeWCS
Sun Apr 21, 2019 1:06 pm
Forum: Extension Writers Discussion
Topic: Some questions and bugs regarding EPV
Replies: 13
Views: 650

Some questions and bugs regarding EPV

Hello Today I discovered by chance that the local version of EPV checks extensions in a different way like the online version of EPV. I use for all examples the GitHub repo from "bb3mobi/washere" so you can reproduce the problem. I use EPV in a WAMP environment by the way. 1. The biggest issue: very...
by LukeWCS
Fri Apr 19, 2019 3:24 pm
Forum: Extensions in Development
Topic: [BETA] [3.1][3.2] LF who was here (2.x)
Replies: 34
Views: 2999

Re: [3.2][BETA] LF who was here (2.x)

Thanks for the example, now I understand what do you want to reach. ;) Let's have a look at the current state: We can disable guest display (number) We can disable bots display (number and names) We can disable hidden users display (number and names) And you want also this: We can disable registered...
by LukeWCS
Fri Apr 19, 2019 12:46 pm
Forum: Extensions in Development
Topic: [BETA] [3.1][3.2] LF who was here (2.x)
Replies: 34
Views: 2999

Re: [3.2][BETA] LF who was here (2.x)

Hello I would like to show only the sum. There are no invisible members on my board. Can you wrote an example what you want to reach? And about "invisible members", have you revoken the relevant permission for all user groups? If not, then you can still have invisible members. So it looks kinda weir...

Go to advanced search