Search found 511 matches

by CLee
Tue Apr 19, 2005 11:52 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Ratzinger #265, wait an ex nazi?
Replies: 104
Views: 10754

He was a former Nazi! Its written in history! Why bring it up if you weren't intending to use it in an attempt to smear him as a person? Do you want the leader of the biggest religon in the world to have an alternative agenda? What makes you so sure that he even has an alternatvie agenda. And just ...
by CLee
Tue Apr 19, 2005 11:38 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Ratzinger #265, wait an ex nazi?
Replies: 104
Views: 10754

Okay, you all are taking this two steps to far. I'm not condeming the man. Simply raising an eyebrow, Sorry, but when you accuse someone of being a Nazi or being a former nazi, then you are condeming them. cause if I don't who will? Perhaps no one. Is it really that important of an issue to receive...
by CLee
Tue Apr 19, 2005 11:25 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Ratzinger #265, wait an ex nazi?
Replies: 104
Views: 10754

Re: Ratzinger #265, wait an ex nazi?

Yup, they choose...a ex- nazi... http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7523254/?GT1=6428 In all seriousness, did they not expect to take fire for this? Where all the others to choose from that bad? Are you condemning a man in his late 70s for something he did when he was just a teenager? Anyways, according t...
by CLee
Tue Apr 19, 2005 11:16 pm
Forum: 2.0.x Support Forum
Topic: phpBB writes XHTML instead of HTML 4.01. How to change?
Replies: 17
Views: 1362

Why not change your template to be XHTML 1.0 complient instead. It would be far easier.
by CLee
Sun Apr 17, 2005 7:57 pm
Forum: 2.0.x Support Forum
Topic: Not valid HTML 4.01
Replies: 5
Views: 211

You are better off recoding the template to valid XHTML because phpBB outputs in XHTML.
by CLee
Sat Apr 16, 2005 11:26 pm
Forum: 2.0.x Support Forum
Topic: PHPBB PLUS 1.3 - HACK !!!! - PLEASE HELP !!!!!
Replies: 7
Views: 267

There is no support for forks of phpBB here.
by CLee
Sun Apr 10, 2005 10:39 pm
Forum: 2.0.x Support Forum
Topic: BMP, no?
Replies: 4
Views: 198

Not likely. Bitmap is a very inefficient image format to begin with, so it is better to convert them to JPEGs or PNGs. I would actually avoid the GIF format unless the image is extremely small and simple or I'm using animation.
by CLee
Sun Apr 10, 2005 6:46 pm
Forum: 2.0.x Support Forum
Topic: pbpbb v.2.0.13 ---> HACKED
Replies: 131
Views: 6259

Mike, provide the webserver logs to the security tracker during the time you were allegedly hacked. and tired of you guys NOT agnoliging the holes with this stupid *beep* retarded software No one will be able to do that (what the heck is agnolig anyways?) until you provide the webserver logs to some...
by CLee
Sun Apr 10, 2005 1:49 am
Forum: 2.0.x Support Forum
Topic: pbpbb v.2.0.13 ---> HACKED
Replies: 131
Views: 6259

See what happens when you stop flame baiting and provide information that is useful to solving the problem. You get a lot more cooperation from people. Other things to check for, scrub your user list of anyone who shouldn't be an admin or moderator. Change your passwords again in the event he/she sn...
by CLee
Sat Apr 09, 2005 10:52 pm
Forum: 2.0.x Support Forum
Topic: need help with patching 2.0.11 > 2.0.13
Replies: 7
Views: 276

Type the following into your shell account: patch --version

If it comes up with nothing or an error, then the patch utility is not available to you.
by CLee
Sat Apr 09, 2005 10:22 pm
Forum: 2.0.x Discussion
Topic: How Secure?
Replies: 2
Views: 197

Paul stated that Olympus will undergo a security review. I'm guessing it will be near the end of the beta testing phase. As for 2.0.x, security threats have actually been few and far between, with only the highlight exploit been the most critical and best publicized of them all. But 2.0.x's biggest ...
by CLee
Sat Apr 09, 2005 10:15 pm
Forum: 2.0.x Support Forum
Topic: pbpbb v.2.0.13 ---> HACKED
Replies: 131
Views: 6259

Anon wrote: As has been said, until you provide some hard proof that phpBB was at fault, we will continue to disbelieve you. Simple as that

Actually, hard proof should go to the security tracker instead.
by CLee
Sat Apr 09, 2005 10:01 pm
Forum: 2.0.x Support Forum
Topic: pbpbb v.2.0.13 ---> HACKED
Replies: 131
Views: 6259

Mike, since you are completely unwilling to provide the log files to the developers for them to check through, you should stop complaining. They won't have a clue where to begin until they see those log files and what you have been doing is utterly irresponsible.
by CLee
Sat Apr 09, 2005 1:32 am
Forum: 2.0.x Support Forum
Topic: my site was HACKED. I had latest version
Replies: 46
Views: 2592

Graham wrote: OK, enough the lot of you. This abusive attitude stops here or I lock the thread.

Sorry about that, but someone being deliberately unhelpful in identifying what a problem is really ticks me off on so many levels. :evil:
by CLee
Fri Apr 08, 2005 9:10 pm
Forum: 2.0.x Support Forum
Topic: my site was HACKED. I had latest version
Replies: 46
Views: 2592

If you are not going to provide the logs to the security tracker so that the developers can look at it, evaluate the possible causes and if it is with phpBB, solve the problem, then STFU.

Go to advanced search