Yes and it will remain that version while I work on it. Right now I wouldn't recommend using it as you'll probably see some alert messages. When this is ready for actual use it'll be labeled RC1.jonasj wrote:Hi
Is the latest version 3.0.0-dev ?
Yes and it will remain that version while I work on it. Right now I wouldn't recommend using it as you'll probably see some alert messages. When this is ready for actual use it'll be labeled RC1.jonasj wrote:Hi
Is the latest version 3.0.0-dev ?
You don't say? Please read the first post where it clearly says this isn't ready to be used live yet. Also from your screenshot I don't see what's wrong.masterbiz wrote:not ready !
Yes. Those are gone. They're not needed in 3.1. The screenshot you're referencing was the earliest version, which has gone through several changes already and will probably go through additional changes.masterbiz wrote:sorry ! I not see configuration ......
I'll consider re-adding the relative width setting back later after getting the zoom to full size feature working. For now I'm more concerned that some of my work is trapped in a VM somewhere... I really wanted to get ahead on this over the weekend and instead had to work on something else because of that.Mattix wrote:Actually, a max width (in % or px) would be handy to constrain images to a fraction of the post width, preventing images from taking large amounts of (especially vertical) space on larger resolutions.
DavidIQ wrote:Yes. Those are gone. They're not needed in 3.1. The screenshot you're referencing was the earliest version, which has gone through several changes already and will probably go through additional changes.masterbiz wrote:sorry ! I not see configuration ......
Not really. I just need to find some time to sit down with this again. I've just been shuffled around at work to another team so I've been very busy the last few weeks and even months, busy enough to even keep me out of IRC and some other online activities that need my attention... Thanks for the offer though. Much appreciated. Hopefully things will be stabilizing soon so I can get back into this.dtleahy wrote:Is there any way that I (or anyone else) can help, DavidIQ?