[3.2][RC] SEO Metadata

A place for Extension Authors to post and receive feedback on Extensions still in development. No Extensions within this forum should be used within a live environment!
Ideas Centre
Forum rules
READ: phpBB.com Board-Wide Rules and Regulations

IMPORTANT: Extensions Development rules

IMPORTANT FOR NEEDED EVENTS!!!
If you need an event for your extension please read this for the steps to follow to request the event(s)
User avatar
Hartenheer
Registered User
Posts: 776
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2015 12:23 pm
Location: The Netherlands
Name: Willem Hartman
Contact:

Re: [3.2][BETA] SEO Metadata

Post by Hartenheer » Wed Sep 04, 2019 11:53 am

</Solidjeuh> wrote:
Wed Sep 04, 2019 11:43 am
NL updated: https://github.com/Solidjeuh/seometadata
Thanks :mrgreen:
Sorry English is not my native language :oops:
regards: Willem

https://bierfijnproevers.nl/bierforum

User avatar
Raul [ThE KuKa]
Style Customisations
Style Customisations
Posts: 6200
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2003 9:24 pm
Location: Spain
Name: Raul Arroyo
Contact:

Re: [3.2][BETA] SEO Metadata

Post by Raul [ThE KuKa] » Wed Sep 04, 2019 4:22 pm

Thanks for "fast" update Alfredo ( aka AbaddonOrmuz )

Nice job always! ;)
All unsolicited PMs will be ignored.
:warning: Knowledge Base | Documentation | Board rules | phpBB Styles Rules & Policies :warning:


If you like my styles, translations, etc. and want to show some appreciation, then feel free to Donate with Image
:flag_es: phpBB Spain - Online Since 2003 :heart:



User avatar
jackennils
Registered User
Posts: 210
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 7:48 pm

Re: [3.2][BETA] SEO Metadata

Post by jackennils » Wed Sep 04, 2019 4:53 pm

Thanks for the update. The php warnings are gone, but there is no og:image or image part in the JSON-LD anymore in the source code. Only if it's an attachment. Local images seem to be ignored. No default image in this case as well. :?

User avatar
AbaddonOrmuz
Registered User
Posts: 661
Joined: Wed Dec 25, 2013 9:06 pm
Location: /dev/null
Name: Alfredo Ramos
Contact:

Re: [3.2][BETA] SEO Metadata 1.2.0-beta5

Post by AbaddonOrmuz » Wed Sep 04, 2019 9:32 pm

Version 1.2.0-beta5 released :?
</Solidjeuh> wrote:
Wed Sep 04, 2019 11:43 am
NL updated: https://github.com/Solidjeuh/seometadata
Raul [ThE KuKa] wrote:
Wed Sep 04, 2019 4:22 pm
Thanks for "fast" update Alfredo ( aka AbaddonOrmuz )

Nice job always! ;)
Thank you both :D
jackennils wrote:
Wed Sep 04, 2019 4:53 pm
The php warnings are gone, but there is no og:image or image part in the JSON-LD anymore in the source code. Only if it's an attachment. Local images seem to be ignored. No default image in this case as well. :?
:|

I just fixed the regression, a functional test was also added to prevent this from happening again.
Some of my phpBB extensions: [ Imgur | SEO Metadata | Markdown ]
Check out all my extensions
Arch Linux user

User avatar
</Solidjeuh>
Registered User
Posts: 1704
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2016 3:45 am
Location: Aalst (Belgium)
Name: Andy Dm
Contact:

Re: [3.2][BETA] SEO Metadata

Post by </Solidjeuh> » Wed Sep 04, 2019 10:04 pm


User avatar
jackennils
Registered User
Posts: 210
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 7:48 pm

Re: [3.2][BETA] SEO Metadata

Post by jackennils » Thu Sep 05, 2019 11:04 am

Looks fine now, thank you! :mrgreen:

User avatar
AbaddonOrmuz
Registered User
Posts: 661
Joined: Wed Dec 25, 2013 9:06 pm
Location: /dev/null
Name: Alfredo Ramos
Contact:

Re: [3.2][RC] SEO Metadata 1.2.0

Post by AbaddonOrmuz » Fri Sep 06, 2019 9:20 pm

Stable version 1.2.0 available for download, see the changelog for more information.

Extension sent for validation.

Edit: Screenshots updated.
Some of my phpBB extensions: [ Imgur | SEO Metadata | Markdown ]
Check out all my extensions
Arch Linux user

MisterHOOk
Registered User
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2019 5:06 pm

Re: [3.2][RC] SEO Metadata

Post by MisterHOOk » Wed Sep 11, 2019 5:18 pm

I am running Board Version 3.2.7
SEO Metatdata 1.2.0
PHP 7.0.33

When I add my image, I keep getting the error Invalid values for fields: Default image width

I tried putting the full URL.. just the image_name.jpg

Local Images yes and tried it with NO

I changed the attachment settings (in the ACP) to 1200 x 800 in case it was an issue

And it just wont save the settings

Image

What am I doing wrong?

User avatar
AbaddonOrmuz
Registered User
Posts: 661
Joined: Wed Dec 25, 2013 9:06 pm
Location: /dev/null
Name: Alfredo Ramos
Contact:

Re: [3.2][RC] SEO Metadata

Post by AbaddonOrmuz » Wed Sep 11, 2019 7:00 pm

MisterHOOk wrote:
Wed Sep 11, 2019 5:18 pm
When I add my image, I keep getting the error Invalid values for fields: Default image width
So, you're trying to use an image with 1200x800 px? There's a limit of 1000 for either width or height.

You have some options:
  1. Use a smaller image
  2. Use the same image but set an scaled dimensions that keep the aspect ratio (like996 x 664)
  3. Modify the file ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/controller/acp.php, change 1000 to 1200
It's already in the validation queue and since it's not a bug, I will raise the limits to 1200 in the next release.
MisterHOOk wrote:
Wed Sep 11, 2019 5:18 pm
I tried putting the full URL.. just the image_name.jpg
Do not use a full URL, it will fail validation.
MisterHOOk wrote:
Wed Sep 11, 2019 5:18 pm
I changed the attachment settings (in the ACP) to 1200 x 800 in case it was an issue
You can revert that change, it doesn't use that information.

That error message only applies for default image, nothing else.
MisterHOOk wrote:
Wed Sep 11, 2019 5:18 pm
What am I doing wrong?
Well, nothing really, it's just that you're trying to use an image larger than the limits I've specified.

It's not a bug either.
Some of my phpBB extensions: [ Imgur | SEO Metadata | Markdown ]
Check out all my extensions
Arch Linux user

User avatar
Forex Station
Registered User
Posts: 72
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2017 2:26 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: [3.2][RC] SEO Metadata

Post by Forex Station » Fri Sep 20, 2019 10:57 am

AbaddonOrmuz wrote:
Wed Sep 11, 2019 7:00 pm

You have some options:

Hey Al, each update you release is a blessing to the board owners here.

I wanted to ask, lately we've been getting errors in our Google Search Console for structured date. Upon testing the affected URL's with Google's Structured Data testing tool (https://search.google.com/structured-data/testing-tool#) we encounter issues with the markups.

Would you happen to know how to correct these within the extension or what can be done to to fix them?

Here's a screenshot and example URL from our site
Thanking you for your ongoing support and extension updates mate.
Proudly powered by phpBB for 3 years and counting: forex-station.com :mrgreen:
Global Alexa rank: 57,000

User avatar
AbaddonOrmuz
Registered User
Posts: 661
Joined: Wed Dec 25, 2013 9:06 pm
Location: /dev/null
Name: Alfredo Ramos
Contact:

Re: [3.2][RC] SEO Metadata

Post by AbaddonOrmuz » Fri Sep 20, 2019 4:26 pm

Forex Station wrote:
Fri Sep 20, 2019 10:57 am
Here's a screenshot and example URL from our site
The script the screenshot is showing, is not part of this extension, which by the way is inserted in the wrong place.

The missing data (author, datePublished, and publisher) will be added in the next version.
Some of my phpBB extensions: [ Imgur | SEO Metadata | Markdown ]
Check out all my extensions
Arch Linux user

User avatar
Forex Station
Registered User
Posts: 72
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2017 2:26 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: [3.2][RC] SEO Metadata

Post by Forex Station » Fri Sep 20, 2019 4:41 pm

AbaddonOrmuz wrote:
Fri Sep 20, 2019 4:26 pm
Forex Station wrote:
Fri Sep 20, 2019 10:57 am
Here's a screenshot and example URL from our site
The script the screenshot is showing, is not part of this extension, which by the way is inserted in the wrong place.

The missing data (author, datePublished, and publisher) will be added in the next version.
Noted. I will investigate further. Thank you for your time my friend and looking forward to the next update :mrgreen:
Proudly powered by phpBB for 3 years and counting: forex-station.com :mrgreen:
Global Alexa rank: 57,000

Post Reply

Return to “Extensions in Development”