[3.2][RC] SEO Metadata

A place for Extension Authors to post and receive feedback on Extensions still in development. No Extensions within this forum should be used within a live environment!
Get Involved
Forum rules
READ: phpBB.com Board-Wide Rules and Regulations

IMPORTANT: Extensions Development rules

IMPORTANT FOR NEEDED EVENTS!!!
If you need an event for your extension please read this for the steps to follow to request the event(s)
User avatar
AbaddonOrmuz
Registered User
Posts: 438
Joined: Wed Dec 25, 2013 9:06 pm
Location: /dev/null
Name: Alfredo Ramos
Contact:

Re: [3.2][BETA] SEO Metadata

Post by AbaddonOrmuz » Fri Nov 09, 2018 5:14 pm

igorbond wrote:
Thu Nov 01, 2018 5:27 pm
When debug is enabled, it gives

[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 119: Undefined offset: 161852
Fixed
igorbond wrote:
Tue Nov 06, 2018 10:58 am
In general, it is not necessary that the pictures were not available, if the first message contains a large number of third-party pictures, the topic simply does not open. :(
While I don't understand the first phrase, I think I know what you tried to say.

The problem is not that it "contains a large number of third-party pictures", because it only fetches 5 from the first post, and work with them (remove duplicates and low resolution images), I think that's a network problem since I have this extension on a production forum and I cant reproduce that issue.

As I said previously, images are cached after the first run.
igorbond wrote:
Sun Nov 04, 2018 9:45 am
If you install the Default image, it does not pick up the images uploaded to the forum, but only the Default image
I don't know what extension is that, but this extension filters the images it can use by image size (>= 200x200 px) and by the setting in the ACP (first found or image size), check the settings you're using.
A proudly user of Arch Linux :: /r/sddm_themes

User avatar
Forex Station
Registered User
Posts: 41
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2017 2:26 pm

Re: [3.2][BETA] SEO Metadata

Post by Forex Station » Sun Nov 11, 2018 10:57 am

AbaddonOrmuz wrote:
Fri Nov 09, 2018 5:14 pm

As I said previously, images are cached after the first run.
Thank you Abad for your efforts and hard work into making this nice extension for us. It's great to see someone trying to improve the SEO for us PhpBB owners. Can't wait to see it finished! ;)
Proudly powered by phpBB for 2 years and counting: forex-station.com :mrgreen:

Victor2018
Registered User
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2018 5:47 am

Re: [3.2][RC] SEO Metadata

Post by Victor2018 » Sun Nov 11, 2018 1:45 pm

In the popular topics (or popular posts, such as this topic), with many page numbers, only the meta descriptions of the first page are displayed, even if the source code of the last page is displayed. This is not good. Each page of the topic should have its own specific meta descriptions. It would be nice to have meta descriptions by post; but it is absolutely necessary to have them by page. Or better nothing. A topic open in January, which continues in November, which arrives on page 60, continues to provide meta descriptions of January, of the first page!

User avatar
AbaddonOrmuz
Registered User
Posts: 438
Joined: Wed Dec 25, 2013 9:06 pm
Location: /dev/null
Name: Alfredo Ramos
Contact:

Re: [3.2][RC] SEO Metadata

Post by AbaddonOrmuz » Sun Nov 11, 2018 6:34 pm

Forex Station wrote:
Sun Nov 11, 2018 10:57 am
Thank you Abad for your efforts and hard work into making this nice extension for us. It's great to see someone trying to improve the SEO for us PhpBB owners. Can't wait to see it finished! ;)
Thanks, the features are all done, it only needs to be polished.
Victor2018 wrote:
Sun Nov 11, 2018 1:45 pm
In the popular topics (or popular posts, such as this topic), with many page numbers, only the meta descriptions of the first page are displayed, even if the source code of the last page is displayed. This is not good.
I don't see why "that is not good", this is for topics not for posts, the first topic is not affected by latter replies.
Victor2018 wrote:
Sun Nov 11, 2018 1:45 pm
Each page of the topic should have its own specific meta descriptions. It would be nice to have meta descriptions by post; but it is absolutely necessary to have them by page.
I don't agree, if the first post of the second page it's something like "Thanks :D", that would be the description of that page, do you really want that? You can't predict what would be the first post of each page and you might find something you don't want to show.

I'm definitely not going to add support for that.
Victor2018 wrote:
Sun Nov 11, 2018 1:45 pm
Or better nothing.
You can easily accomplish that by not using this extension.
Victor2018 wrote:
Sun Nov 11, 2018 1:45 pm
A topic open in January, which continues in November, which arrives on page 60, continues to provide meta descriptions of January, of the first page!
I don't see how that's a problem.

For a blog, for example, you want the text from the post of from comments? I know it's not the same but the replies act as comments on a board.
A proudly user of Arch Linux :: /r/sddm_themes

Victor2018
Registered User
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2018 5:47 am

Re: [3.2][RC] SEO Metadata

Post by Victor2018 » Sun Nov 11, 2018 8:01 pm

Not good, because in this way the content of meta descriptions is incoherent with the content of the page; that is, it is negative both for SEO purposes and for sharing on social networks, both automatically and manually.

I understand that "you can not do it" by post; but by page it is necessary, for guarantee coherence between meta description and page content! I know that to resolve I have to uninstall the extension. In fact, I uninstalled it. I just wanted to report the problems to the utility of the Community so that the extension could improve. But you are free to ignore my report.

"Happy you, all happy!"

User avatar
AbaddonOrmuz
Registered User
Posts: 438
Joined: Wed Dec 25, 2013 9:06 pm
Location: /dev/null
Name: Alfredo Ramos
Contact:

Re: [3.2][RC] SEO Metadata

Post by AbaddonOrmuz » Sun Nov 11, 2018 8:06 pm

Victor2018 wrote:
Sun Nov 11, 2018 8:01 pm
Not good, because in this way the content of meta descriptions is incoherent with the content of the page; that is, it is negative both for SEO purposes and for sharing on social networks, both automatically and manually.

I understand that "you can not do it" by post; but by page it is necessary, for guarantee coherence between meta description and page content! I know that to resolve I have to uninstall the extension. In fact, I uninstalled it. I just wanted to report the problems to the utility of the Community so that the extension could improve. But you are free to ignore my report.

"Happy you, all happy!"
Mission accomplished 8-)
A proudly user of Arch Linux :: /r/sddm_themes

User avatar
jackennils
Registered User
Posts: 194
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 7:48 pm

Re: [3.2][RC] SEO Metadata

Post by jackennils » Sun Nov 11, 2018 8:08 pm

Well done! It's fine the way it is and I agree with all your above arguments. :)

User avatar
</Solidjeuh>
Registered User
Posts: 1154
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2016 3:45 am
Location: Aalst (Belgium)
Name: Andy Dm
Contact:

Re: [3.2][RC] SEO Metadata

Post by </Solidjeuh> » Sun Nov 11, 2018 9:09 pm

And still working perfect! I made a pull request with the updated NL translation
We offer fun HTML5 games for young and old.
Register a free account & enjoy all functions!
Save your score, challenge other members or play along with our tournaments.


~~~ https://www.solidjeuh.be ~~~

igorbond
Registered User
Posts: 86
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 5:54 pm

Re: [3.2][RC] SEO Metadata

Post by igorbond » Tue Nov 13, 2018 3:54 pm

I put the latest version and now the name of the conference is also displayed in the title of the topic, should it be so? Previously this was not.

User avatar
AbaddonOrmuz
Registered User
Posts: 438
Joined: Wed Dec 25, 2013 9:06 pm
Location: /dev/null
Name: Alfredo Ramos
Contact:

Re: [3.2][RC] SEO Metadata

Post by AbaddonOrmuz » Wed Nov 14, 2018 3:25 am

jackennils wrote:
Sun Nov 11, 2018 8:08 pm
Well done! It's fine the way it is and I agree with all your above arguments. :)
Thanks :D
</Solidjeuh> wrote:
Sun Nov 11, 2018 9:09 pm
And still working perfect! I made a pull request with the updated NL translation
I really appreciate your help, I replied the pull request.
igorbond wrote:
Tue Nov 13, 2018 3:54 pm
I put the latest version and now the name of the conference is also displayed in the title of the topic, should it be so? Previously this was not.
Conference? I don't know what you are referring to.

Nothing was changed regarding the title (reference), in fact the title is generated by phpBB itself and this only fetches that as is, no modifications are made to it.
A proudly user of Arch Linux :: /r/sddm_themes

Post Reply

Return to “Extensions in Development”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: caiocald, davidyin, Holger, Majestic-12 [Bot], pikachuturkey, wojtek64 and 21 guests