Please do not "put" words into my mouth, as they saying goes by implying i am flaming people making suggestions.
I wasn't implying you were flaming, I was implying that the conversation at large went into the wrong direction for what is basically just a simple suggestion of wording. Your point that a user manual may help in clearing up the functioning of the system is completely valid. It's also fair to point out that not everyone can be pleased; if the replacement term doesn't add any clearity, you will
have to rely on a more detailed explanation in a manual (which is what I understand your first comment about the user manual to imply). Whether the replacement term actually adds any clarity could be something we discuss here (I think the TS has a fair, albeit minor point).
However, when someone says, most people do not read manuals, I take that to mean basically the same thing I said: the best user interface is one that doesn't need a manual. Then replying by simply saying that the group can not be held responsible when people do not read the manual (which is absolutely true in itself) tells me that you missed the point, and possibly don't really care about UI clarity and would rather not bother with it at all. That's
what I was addressing, nothing else.
Remember i am allowed to make statements or observations just as much as you guys are
Of course you are, and that's also the nature of my comments. I didn't for one moment assume you were somehow reflecting the position of the entire phpBB group.