Repsonsive ACP required?

Ger · Post by **Ger** » Tue Mar 06, 2018 10:01 am

My Feed Post Bot extension was denied, in the deny message 1 of the points was that the ACP page has a table that isn't responsive. I know that, however: I chose to make it that way and I don't see anything mentioned in the validation policy about responsive ACP pages.There are other parts in the ACP (permissions, bots) that aren't perfectly responsive. But hey, it works, doesn't it?

Ideally I would redesign the entire page, but that seems quite extensive at this point for some minor issue. I don't see how to improve it in a simple manner. I'm in RC phase, is this really something to overhaul completely? Is it required to pass validation? If so, IMO it should be mentioned in the validation policy.

-edit-
I was told through PM that this wasn't a reason for denial.

david63 · Post by **david63** » Tue Mar 06, 2018 10:32 am

Try using <table class="table.table3"> - there are several built in css table codes

Ger · Post by **Ger** » Tue Mar 06, 2018 12:06 pm

david63 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 06, 2018 10:32 am Try using <table class="table.table3"> - there are several built in css table codes

I think you meant table.type3?
Thanks, that improves it a bit indeed.

3Di · Post by **3Di** » Tue Mar 06, 2018 6:13 pm

Ger wrote: ↑Tue Mar 06, 2018 12:06 pm that improves it a bit indeed.

I didn't test your extension (feedpostbot I guess?) but I have a table in my ACP which is responsive

FWIW https://github.com/3D-I/HighlightPosts/ ... ml#L10-L25
-

.

Ger · Post by **Ger** » Wed Mar 07, 2018 8:09 am

Thanks, but the thing is: it's a table with 11 columns, not only informational but mostly with actions. Once started there were only 4 columns (of which 1 a counter and 1 a simple button) but with all the options it has grown a bit out of control.

I intend to redesign the whole ACP part to let each feed have it's own page (alike BBcode management etc.). Many users have also asked for even more options to configure it so I have to do that anyway if I want to help them. I just don't like to do that in RC phase; I want this thing validated at some point. So the option David63 gave me is good for now.
Once validated I'll take a look at more thorough redesigns.