The current phpBB urls are perfectly fine for SEO friendliness. That’s a fact, a given.
Not sure what requires so much attention.
https://developers.google.com/search/bl ... tatic-urlsQ: Does that mean I should avoid rewriting dynamic URLs at all?
A: That's our recommendation, unless your rewrites are limited to removing unnecessary parameters, or you are very diligent in removing all parameters that could cause problems. If you transform your dynamic URL to make it look static you should be aware that we might not be able to interpret the information correctly in all cases. If you want to serve a static equivalent of your site, you might want to consider transforming the underlying content by serving a replacement which is truly static. One example would be to generate files for all the paths and make them accessible somewhere on your site. However, if you're using URL rewriting (rather than making a copy of the content) to produce static-looking URLs from a dynamic site, you could be doing harm rather than good. Feel free to serve us your standard dynamic URL and we will automatically find the parameters which are unnecessary.
Instead look a bit, I have several sites, in PhpBB and not and they are all at the top of the SERPs, but you have to understand how many keywords and above all how many they can become, by perfecting the SEO..!
If you still search, this seo url works fine with phpBB 3.3.4 and 3.3.5. Check pull request where you can find fix for PHP 8.0 warnings
I've tried uploading that several ways into the ext folder but it's not showing up in the ACP.KevC wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2020 5:46 pm There's this by the look of it and it says it's 3.3 ready
https://github.com/phpbb-seo/usu