And what about the other 218 on the plane? They are ALL important, no matter American, Italian, German, French, or Oompa-Loompa.3Di wrote:Ten Italians MIA.
I expressed my position from a Nationalist view, certainty that the thought goes to all.Brainy wrote:And what about the other 218 on the plane? They are ALL important, no matter American, Italian, German, French, or Oompa-Loompa.3Di wrote:Ten Italians MIA.
Hopefully they find them soon.
Do not, put words in my mouth. There are more enlightened people whom do not subscribe to trans 19th to 20th century Nationalist views (last refuge of a scoundrel). People are people, to draw lines by virtue of place of birth, makes you the "frog in a well".3Di wrote:I expressed my position from a Nationalist view, certainty that the thought goes to all.Brainy wrote:And what about the other 218 on the plane? They are ALL important, no matter American, Italian, German, French, or Oompa-Loompa.3Di wrote:Ten Italians MIA.
Hopefully they find them soon.
There is not need of to underline it.
It's possible for a modern plane to loose all electric power and still be flyable even with completely digital fly-by-wire systems using the velocity of the plane and the emergency ram air turbine power is generated to provide control. The fly-by-wire systems are also multi redundant, however according to Wikipedia and sources the plane suffered multiple system failures including loss of backup systems. Which isn't going to end well. The last message transmitted possibly indicated cabin depressurisation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_France_Flight_447SamG wrote:I hadn't heard that there was anything suspect about the disaster. I'm not an aircraft expert, but it would seem possible, at least, that any aircraft suffering from multiple electrical system malfunctions at high altitude in bad weather is at risk. It's not clear to me why the malfunctions themselves couldn't be caused by one or more lightening strikes (which could cause physical damage to the aircraft as well?), so I guess I'm reluctant to credit any suspicions of foul play without better supporting facts.
That's what I was driving at. The "totally unprecedented situation" comment captured in the wiki article was in the press early on. I probably should not have used the term "electrical systems."ToonArmy wrote:... the plane suffered multiple system failures ...
"Aviation experts said the risk the plane was brought down by lightning was slim," according to the Orange County Register. That's fine. I think my point is that getting suspicious at this point involves more assumptions than I'm willing to make. I think it better at this point, out of respect for those suffering if for no other reason, to avoid speculation about a suspicions. Just my opinion, of course.3Di wrote:It's 'lightening strikes free'.