Darth Wong wrote:
Are you seriously denying that there's probable cause here for further investigation? Are you kidding?
You know what probable cause is, right? It's a reason to go looking for your "smoking gun". You can't say that there's no smoking gun yet, therefore no probable cause.
I do not believe I wrote anything about "denying" anything, did I?
All I have seen posted so far that comes close to results of investigation is the Panorama
article and I don't see a "smoking gun" there. I probably missed something posted elsewhere in this thread, true.
I'd be happy to read anything you have that sheds more light on this matter. What have you got? What are you basing your views on? Please, help me better understand what's going on.