So we throw human nature and animal instict out the window because a few people like to have relationships with other people of the same sex?
Ahhh good point, because there are so few gay people in the world....
Hetrosexual sex and homosexual sex, in my opinion, are two very different things done for very different reasons. Homosexuality is as valid as beasiality as an actual sexuality, its more of a fetish.
I will really hope for your sake that no one on this board who might be gay reads your post there, as I'm sure you've probabaly offended them to the point of calling for your head. Calling being gay and being into sex with animals is really crossing the line and a completely ignorant view I'd say. However, at the same time you get so offended when a few pople call priests pedophiles....
I dont think anybody would disagree that our need to reproduce and pass on our genes is completely instinctual, and that relationships and sexuality have a basis in our need to reproduce. They are all linked very closely.
And should cloning become widespread with humans it would drasticly change the way we think about sex , reproduction, relationships and our own genealogy.
It would not change the way people thing about relationships and sex. People will stay in relationships for loving companionship. If it was just to reproduce then we would be just like all the animals that look for a partner during mating season. That's why people who are sterile will still be in a relationship, even though they won't be passing on any genes. That's why a couple who can't concieve will adopt a child yet STILL stay together and not get divorced. People also have sex because they like sex. If people only had sex to make a baby, condomn sales would be non-existant. If we could suddenly clone ourselves, and people decided more so that they would prefer a clone instead of a baby, people would still have just as much sex, only difference is birth control would be used even more.