Pit wrote:the rat wrote:WWII ended when Hitler surrended.
Actually, I would say that WWII ended when Japan surrendered.
Whatever... my point still stands. That's if you care to have a discussion...
Who would surrender in the War on Terror?
the rat wrote: Who would surrender in the War on Terror?
Pit wrote: If you want to go on about interminable wars, perhaps we should talk about the War on Drugs? Who can surrender in that war?
the rat wrote: No one. You cannot fight a war against a noun. It shows how ridiculous the concept is.
Pit wrote:the rat wrote:No one. You cannot fight a war against a noun. It shows how ridiculous the concept is.
So in fact we don't have the "indefinate war"?
the rat wrote: I know what you are trying to do
Darth Wong wrote: It's interesting to note that Kadafi, dictator of Libya, once occupied a position very similar to the position occupied by Hussein.
Pit wrote:CTCNetwork wrote:Maybe, just maybe, our muslim friends were not wholly responsible for 11/9?
Islamist terrorists did WTC.
I know this because I don't have a radioactive eel inside my skull eating my brain.
phantomk wrote: Are you implying that CTCNetwork has an electric eel in his skull ? I just don't get the eel bit ...
CTCNetwork wrote: However, I personally thing this was all set up for the US's benefit - to get ann excuse to send the boys out and "secure resources" (for the US of course") and to maybe ramp up the oil profits that 80% of the members of the federal cabinet are now enjoying back on their oil companies..
Looks like it worked!
Des. . .
PS: Anyone got a spare eel??
Darth Wong wrote: Riamus: I find it hard to believe that you can call your speculation about the future to be "fact" when you don't even have any evidence that we're moving in the right direction. A logical person makes conclusions based on the facts at hand, not facts that do not exist but that he hopes will exist someday.
Pit wrote: So in fact we don't have the "indefinate war"?
Riamus wrote: How many times do I need to repeat myself? I did not state that I was making a conclusion about whether or not this was a worthwhile war. I've stated over and over that I'm not making such a conclusion. I've not said that we're moving in the right direction. The entire thing you keep responding to (but never actually responding to as you side step my entire point and put words in my mouth) is that the END RESULT is not a result in the middle of an outcome, but the result found after EVERYTHING is finished.