Pluto - A Planet no more

Discussion of non-phpBB related topics with other phpBB.com users.
Forum rules
General Discussion is a bonus forum for discussion of non-phpBB related topics with other phpBB.com users. All site rules apply.
sempai
Registered User
Posts: 58
Joined: Tue May 20, 2003 3:15 am
Contact:

Pluto - A Planet no more

Post by sempai » Fri Aug 25, 2006 5:40 am

Pluto stripped of its status as a planet

There is much heated debate on the discussion of Pluto. Back in my primary years, the solar system has been my favorite subject. Ever since then, there isn't much information on pluto over the years. Do you think exlusion of the farthest planet would it change our view of the solar system? Science teachers would say in the future that Pluto was once called a "planet".

Any thoughts? :)
Dual! Parallel Trouble Adventure Fan Site
http://dualfans.host.sk

User avatar
karlsemple
Former Team Member
Posts: 39802
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 8:54 am
Location: Hereford, UK
Contact:

Post by karlsemple » Fri Aug 25, 2006 5:59 am

seems odd to think something i was taught at school not so long back may then turn out not to be the case....you have it drummed into your head for so long its going to seem odd.
Image

User avatar
lurttinen
Translator
Posts: 4670
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2004 12:05 pm
Location: Tampere, Finland
Name: Martti Lokka
Contact:

Post by lurttinen » Fri Aug 25, 2006 6:16 am

Looks like the article missed out the object named UB313. Commonly known as "Xena"
Xena is also bigger than pluto so that is what caused them to rearrange the terms of planets

The Pluto is still there, Only the definition has changed.
Signature is here

starfoxtj
Registered User
Posts: 3714
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2003 2:01 am
Contact:

Post by starfoxtj » Fri Aug 25, 2006 8:22 am

Bah its been thought of as a planet so long they should keep its status!

But really, a planet is a subjective term that fits into a set critera, what stops them from revising the critera again in the near future? Might as well just leave it as is instead of having to reprint billions of books that say its a planet.
Admin ToolKit v2.1a - An Admins most helpful tool for user management. Now Supports Mass User Deletion!
Change User's: names, passwords, emails, active status and avatar/pm permissions.
Ban/Unban Users, change Post and Resync Counts, and promote/demote users to admin.
Completely independent from your phpbb user account settings. No installation required, just upload one file.
User Upload ToolKit Beta - A quick and easy, 30 second-install, attachment mod. Now Supports Dynamic Thumbnails!

User avatar
battye
Extension Customisations
Extension Customisations
Posts: 10940
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2004 11:02 am
Location: Australia
Contact:

Post by battye » Fri Aug 25, 2006 10:21 am

starfoxtj wrote: Bah its been thought of as a planet so long they should keep its status!


There is no scientific reasoning behind that, but I fully agree with you.
Customisations Team Member

https://github.com/battye/php-array-parser - Give it a Star! :D

User avatar
Nephrus
Former Team Member
Posts: 1178
Joined: Sat Oct 19, 2002 4:05 am
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Contact:

Post by Nephrus » Fri Aug 25, 2006 5:01 pm

In school, we were taught that Pluto was a planet, or a dwarf planet at least. So not sure why it was removed, but I'm not a scientist/astronomer so I can't provide anything further than that.

Should've at least been called a planet since it had been called one for so long.
[ Zelda Planet - nephrus.net - phpBB Userguide - phpBB Knowledge Base - phpBB.com Forum Rules ]
ABSOLUTELY NO support via PM/IM/email or I'll get a cow to sit on you

Newfie
Registered User
Posts: 221
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 12:08 am
Location: A Canadian Province - guess which one?

Post by Newfie » Fri Aug 25, 2006 10:18 pm

The old saying:

"My very educated mother just served us nine pizzas"

would become

"My very educated mother just served us nachos"

or something like that

Anyone remember that?

With that mentality, shouldn't Rhode Island no longer be a state or PEI no longer be a province?

niksa
Registered User
Posts: 612
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2003 7:20 pm
Location: Future birthplace of James T. Kirk
Contact:

Post by niksa » Fri Aug 25, 2006 11:14 pm

If we kept everything the same for the sake of tradition, or because "that's how we were taught" then nothing would progress!

Pluto is a minor planetary body... it's a part of the Kuiper belt. It's just as important as "Xena" or any of the other Kuiper belt objects. In the 1800s, we used to classify Ceres, an asteroid between Mars and Jupiter as a planet too. We got over it. ;)

dsprvd
I've Been Banned!
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 9:51 pm

Post by dsprvd » Sat Aug 26, 2006 12:56 am

Heh I hope my teacher knows about this or I am bound to flunk this grade!

User avatar
lazyleo
Registered User
Posts: 6
Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 7:26 pm
Contact:

Post by lazyleo » Sat Aug 26, 2006 8:18 am

Thank God! I Finished school...

Newfie
Registered User
Posts: 221
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 12:08 am
Location: A Canadian Province - guess which one?

Post by Newfie » Sat Aug 26, 2006 9:51 am

The giant space rocks, whatever you call them, are still there as they are, it's more so an opinion about what is and isn't a planet.

Instead of planets, asteroids, meteors, comets, etc. maybe we should just call all of them "giant space rocks". That oughta clear it up for the astronomers who have a hard time making up their minds about what category each giant space rock would fit in. :lol:

palmirabase.net
Registered User
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 7:20 pm

Post by palmirabase.net » Sun Aug 27, 2006 7:30 pm

Meh, my science teacher says they change their minds every 10-15 years... :roll:

User avatar
Anon
Former Team Member
Posts: 7019
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2004 7:33 am
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand

Post by Anon » Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:02 pm

Nephrus wrote: So not sure why it was removed, but I'm not a scientist/astronomer so I can't provide anything further than that.


Because it is too small to be considered a full planet, and other forms larger than it are not. However I support changing it, since if it was never an actual planet, what's the point in addressing it as one? If we change it's status, future generations at least will not see it as a planet, so we'll forget about it completly

User avatar
smithy_dll
Former Team Member
Posts: 7630
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2002 6:27 am
Location: Australia
Name: Lachlan Smith
Contact:

Post by smithy_dll » Sun Aug 27, 2006 9:29 pm

It's a great outcome, and a huge win for science.

Science is about discovery. And now that we have an actual definition of what a planet is, we can go on discovering and classifying celestial bodies that are out there, both in our solar system, and others.

Remember, Pluto was only discovered in 1930, and at that time we thought it was much larger than it really is. In science we learn more about something, and we re-classify it if we need to. For example, we ourselves are all animals, it cannot be denied.

There is so much we do not know about our solar system, and projects such as the hubble space telescope have allowed us to learn so much more about our solar system, and the universe at large. There is still alot to learn out there for a long time yet. 8)

Vanderloogen
Registered User
Posts: 37
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 2:24 am

Post by Vanderloogen » Tue Aug 29, 2006 1:37 am

I think it's just about a group of dudes who want to make a name for themselves

Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”

cron