As always the day after the day before its done.Josemi wrote:For when can be expect final version?
I imagine someone will make a version suitable for 3.1.xNeilUK wrote:Does this signal the end of subSilver altogether or will there be a subSilver3 ?
My Forum users won't let me install other styles, they are traditionists and only use subSilver
It won't be supported anymore so the devs won't provide update paths to it, if they did it wouldn't make sense to drop support for it .daman2k wrote:Are you going to make the code edits needed for every version available?
I believe the term is "luddite". I participate at a forum which upgraded to phpBB 3 about a year ago and there was a big commotion about the new proSilver theme.NeilUK wrote:My Forum users won't let me install other styles, they are traditionists and only use subSilver
As far as I am aware the performance difference between proSilver and subsilver2 is negligible. There have been some anecdotal claims otherwise, but thus far I am not aware of anyone reproducing this difference in a controlled test to produce actual figures confirming this.marian0810 wrote:But prosilver styles make the forum sooooo much slower...
Actually I did last year after reading a post by drathbun making the same assertion that his benchmark tests showed subsilver performing better than prosilver. I had the same result using our benchmarking systems in the development lab at work. There was nothing anecdotal about my results. I also thought I remember the devs eventually acknowledging the problems with prosilver but that conversation may not have taken place in a public forum.Phil wrote:but thus far I am not aware of anyone reproducing this difference in a controlled test to produce actual figures confirming this.