If you mean the countdown timer, that's nice.MichaelC wrote: We just added a little extra something to the launch page, we hope you like it.
But how about some love on the launch page for Web site integration?
Steve
If you mean the countdown timer, that's nice.MichaelC wrote: We just added a little extra something to the launch page, we hope you like it.
I would like to know as wellPony99CA wrote:Has the security audit been done against phpBB 3.1? The launch page says that you "hired a professional security company to audit the entire phpBB 3.1 codebase", but doesn't say whether the audit was completed.
Steve
I did not mean to leave that ambiguous. The audit was completed at the end of September and nothing major was found.Pony99CA wrote:Has the security audit been done against phpBB 3.1? The launch page says that you "hired a professional security company to audit the entire phpBB 3.1 codebase", but doesn't say whether the audit was completed.
Steve
No it has been stated in a lot of places already, that 3.0 will be supported for quite some months aswellpennino wrote:When (October, 28) phpBB 3.1 will be released, phpBB 3.0.12 users have to immediately upgrade to v3.1 or it would be possible to wait days or weeks before upgrading?
We are running a quite famous phpBB 3.0.12 board. Upgrading to 3.1 in a few days would be impossible for us.
Nothing is known to us, and if something comes up in the next months we will of course fix it. we also have a potential 3.0.13 build up, whether and when this is going to be released, I don't know.pennino wrote:There are no security issues in phpBB 3.0.12, isn'it? So it would be safe to continue to use that version while locally testing v3.1?
Will phpBB 3.0.12 be upgraded (security and critical updates if needed) or it will be retired after version 3.1 of phpBB will be published?
i'll pick this one up:BondGamer wrote:I have not followed phpBB development for years. Are extensions going to completely replace MODs? What percentage of MODs out there could be turned into an extension? How do extensions impact site performance?
maybe more appropriate question will be "how many of the existing mods *will** be available as extensions. my guess is, probably less than 20%. many of the existing mods are just unnecessary in the first place, and some of them provide functionality that is either in-built or just not needed with 3.1. many mods provide "duplicate" functionality - i predict less of this for extensions, at least for some time.Jeffrey D. Case wrote: Back on the farm, we have a saying:
``Sure, almost anything is possible. You can even teach a goldfish to play the piano, if you use enough voltage.''
To add to this: we will not be accepting MODs for 3.1 whatsoever. Whatever customisation it is that is wanted to be released will need to be an extension. If an extension behaves like a MOD (i.e. edits core code) it will not be accepted into the CDB.arod-1 wrote:i'll pick this one up:BondGamer wrote:I have not followed phpBB development for years. Are extensions going to completely replace MODs? What percentage of MODs out there could be turned into an extension? How do extensions impact site performance?
# Are extensions going to completely replace MODs?
yes. of course...