Now lets have a think about this.juliokr wrote:Monday, September 22, 2008 !<snip>HiFiKabin wrote:from http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot. ... -urls.html
If you want to have on a look on a little bit newer document of Google (©Copyright 2010 Google )HiFiKabin wrote:In September 2008 Google posted that information and it has not been updated since. Why might this be? There are two possible reasons:-
Simple-to-understand URLs will convey content information easily ...
...Some users might link to your page using the URL of that page as the anchor text. If your URL contains relevant words, this provides users and search engines with more information about the page than an ID or oddly named parameter would ...
That's 100% true and I agree !Ger wrote:Look, if you want to change your URLs than do so. If you don't care about it, than don't. There are more or less valid arguments for both sides.
At the origin there was a question of 1 person who was looking for an alternative for seo mod which doesn't existe anymore. This is a legally question or not ?Ger wrote:
But please, please stop bringing this up every week or so. Or simple close all the new topics about it, referring to a previous one. I'm getting too old for this stuff...
Who's been banned?juliokr wrote:No reason to bann
I have been meaning no reason to bann (or close) the topic as Ger asked for !Mick wrote:Who's been banned?juliokr wrote:No reason to bann
Do a search for corn and find out where you rank. It's not difficult at all to rank for specific long tail results. "Corn" on the other hand is a very competitive search term. All things being equal other than optimization a forum that has been optimized is going to rank higher for "corn" or "corn snake morphs" than one that isn't.I know some of those results may be due to tracking, but as an experiment try to search for 'corn snake morphs' in your favourite search engine and see if the link in my signature pops up on page one of your results.