Has or was?
Depends on where both softwares run, but since you mention "window" I guess the program runs client-side and your phpBB installation runs server-side. In that case all you have to do is what an internet browser does: sending HTTP requests and parsing its responses. Which I don't think is "dirty" and to my experience is always less limited/error prone than what a website offers as an API (which is talking thru HTTP again anyway).
Support for 3.0 has ended and 3.1 will be going the same way on July 1st so, if you blow up your board by playing with core files or whatever, there will be no support for a 3.0 board. It’s hardly worthwhile upgrading to 3.1 now so I suggest you upgrade to 3.2.2 before you start any of this as you’ll probably have to do it all over again when you do eventually upgrade anyway.
AmigoJack wrote: ↑Thu May 17, 2018 7:01 amHas or was?
Depends on where both softwares run, but since you mention "window" I guess the program runs client-side and your phpBB installation runs server-side. In that case all you have to do is what an internet browser does: sending HTTP requests and parsing its responses. Which I don't think is "dirty" and to my experience is always less limited/error prone than what a website offers as an API (which is talking thru HTTP again anyway).
i meant how to get SID and go to forum in browser?
It is in every HTTP response, so you "get" it always. Query the index of your board and you'll get (amongst other data) the current SID.
Your program becomes the browser by communicating thru HTTP. Browsers are (just like games and media players) only programs, too - they've been programmed thru code.
You don't "embed" or "insert" your board, your program will communicate with your board. The board and your program are two different softwares, why would one wanto to merge one into the other?