I don’t quite agree as there was no such thing in 3.3.0.
There is (just tested it) - and as far as I can recall this has been the case since phpBB 3.1Harry_Harry wrote: ↑Sat Aug 08, 2020 11:45 am I don’t quite agree as there was no such thing in 3.3.0.
I'm sorry, but I've never had this before.There is (just tested it) - and as far as I can recall this has been the case since phpBB 3.1
Code: Select all
<div class="pointer">
<div class="pointer-inner"></div>
</div>
Code: Select all
<div class="pointer">
<div class="pointer-inner"></div>
<ul class="dropdown-contents dropdown-nonscroll"....
</div>
Code: Select all
/**
* Responsive tabs
*/
Code: Select all
item = ul.append('
<li class="tab responsive-tab" style="display:none;">
<a href="javascript:void(0);" class="responsive-tab-link"> </a>
<div class="dropdown tab-dropdown" style="display: none;">
<div class="pointer">
<div class="pointer-inner" /></div>
</div>
<ul class="dropdown-contents" /></div></li>
').find('li.responsive-tab'),
I did the same, but without the backslashHarry_Harry wrote: ↑Sat Aug 08, 2020 9:03 pm Just added second tag </div> after closed block <div class="pointer-inner" /></div>
In the end, this is how it happened: <div class="pointer-inner" /></div></div>
I understand that this is not entirely true, but it works![]()
Code: Select all
<div class="pointer-inner"></div>
Hi!GIK-Team wrote: ↑Sat Aug 08, 2020 9:09 pmI did the same, but without the backslashHarry_Harry wrote: ↑Sat Aug 08, 2020 9:03 pm Just added second tag </div> after closed block <div class="pointer-inner" /></div>
In the end, this is how it happened: <div class="pointer-inner" /></div></div>
I understand that this is not entirely true, but it works![]()
![]()
Code: Select all
<div class="pointer-inner"></div>
Yes, this will definitely be fixed in the future, but we somehow need to live now. It is one thing when it is in the administrative part, and quite another when it affects users of our sites.Harry_Harry wrote: ↑Sat Aug 08, 2020 9:26 pm Hi!
This is it works and it's good. All perfectly! I am sure they and we will find a why in the future if strong need be.![]()