This is a English speaking siteDavidIQ wrote:Русский
Really?david63 wrote:This is a English speaking siteDavidIQ wrote:Русский
That's fine and dandy but we do not endorse that at all. The only place officially endorsed by us for language pack downloads is the language pack downloads section of our site. Those have actual oversight, validation and individual maintainers. Users downloading language packs from other places do so at their own risk.canonknipser wrote:I'm not sure if the current numerology is really correct in a overall term, because some local support sides (eg. german and french, and may be many others) provide localized phpBB-Versions, so there is in that case no need to download a language pack from phpbb.com.
Hi Igor,LavIgor wrote:It's a pity that none of my extensions are in the list.
UE and QR have been firstly validated in 2016, but it just took years for making them compatible with the CDB standards.
They received more than 3k and 1k downloads respectively this year, but they were submitted earlier. That's why they're not in the statistics 'submitted in 2016'.
I suppose that most downloads of my extensions come from GitHub (for many reasons), maybe I should re-think the main source because of that kind of statistics.
At least I'm glad for the language package at the first place.
yet your upload extensions extension is the best one out there imo!LavIgor wrote:It's a pity that none of my extensions are in the list.
UE and QR have been firstly validated in 2016, but it just took years for making them compatible with the CDB standards.
They received more than 3k and 1k downloads respectively this year, but they were submitted earlier. That's why they're not in the statistics 'submitted in 2016'.
I suppose that most downloads of my extensions come from GitHub (for many reasons), maybe I should re-think the main source because of that kind of statistics.
At least I'm glad for the language package at the first place.