I don't know what you mean with that. I believe I addressed all of the points you made in your post.
Because all the links he posted are internal to this domain phpbb.com? You do know what the term "spam" means, yes?
I'm certain that there is sincerity in your opinion, but the complexity of what is being done with 3.2, for instance, can't possibly be considered "usability". Particularly with the board logo. IMO, the logo is paramount for a professional looking site. It has now been made a clumsy and technically over built gadget that only a technophobe could love. Why the devil would you want to destroy a perfectly functioning process for such an important mod? Are you old enough to remember the Edsel?
I'm sorry maybe I missed something. You posted the following:Farmer Dusty wrote: ↑Mon Mar 20, 2017 11:44 pm Henh. I can see there's no bias there. Got anything positive to contribute?
If you're not looking to improve some process or usability in our software then what exactly is the point of your topic? You're supposedly giving "constructive" feedback, specifically about changing the logo, but it is as useful as receiving "A general error has occurred" message in an operating system. Very little changed in how the logo is presented in the header between 3.0 and 3.2 so was trying to figure out what you were on about. If this sort of feedback is not what you're intending then..Farmer Dusty wrote: ↑Mon Mar 20, 2017 9:54 pm I'm certain that there is sincerity in your opinion, but the complexity of what is being done with 3.2, for instance, can't possibly be considered "usability". Particularly with the board logo. IMO, the logo is paramount for a professional looking site. It has now been made a clumsy and technically over built gadget that only a technophobe could love. Why the devil would you want to destroy a perfectly functioning process for such an important mod? Are you old enough to remember the Edsel?
Like David said, changing your board logo hasn't changed much, if at all.Farmer Dusty wrote: ↑Mon Mar 20, 2017 9:54 pm Particularly with the board logo. IMO, the logo is paramount for a professional looking site. It has now been made a clumsy and technically over built gadget that only a technophobe could love. Why the devil would you want to destroy a perfectly functioning process for such an important mod?
DavidIQ wrote: ↑Mon Mar 20, 2017 11:52 pmNow you are being deliberately obtuse. I know from experience that techies are some of the most thin skinned characters on the web and I never meant to rub you fir the wrong way, but it's your dander that's screwing up the point of this discussion index. Take a deep breath and stop with the animus. Nobody is ragging on you.Farmer Dusty wrote: ↑Mon Mar 20, 2017 11:44 pm Henh. I can see there's no bias there. Got anything positive to contribute?
Your conduct over my critique is obscene.
Hogwash!JimA wrote: ↑Tue Mar 21, 2017 12:29 amLike David said, changing your board logo hasn't changed much, if at all.Farmer Dusty wrote: ↑Mon Mar 20, 2017 9:54 pm Particularly with the board logo. IMO, the logo is paramount for a professional looking site. It has now been made a clumsy and technically over built gadget that only a technophobe could love. Why the devil would you want to destroy a perfectly functioning process for such an important mod?
Once again you've not provided anything useful. Your responses to my queries for further information and your responses to other team members in this topic make it obvious that you didn't post here to provide any actual feedback. Since you're not interested in having an actual discussion and are instead more interested in hurling insults and just beating around the bush then there is nothing further to say here.Farmer Dusty wrote: ↑Tue Mar 21, 2017 4:07 amHogwash!JimA wrote: ↑Tue Mar 21, 2017 12:29 amLike David said, changing your board logo hasn't changed much, if at all.Farmer Dusty wrote: ↑Mon Mar 20, 2017 9:54 pm Particularly with the board logo. IMO, the logo is paramount for a professional looking site. It has now been made a clumsy and technically over built gadget that only a technophobe could love. Why the devil would you want to destroy a perfectly functioning process for such an important mod?