Very nice I like that.mcallegari wrote: ↑Sun Mar 26, 2017 9:43 am I hacked the ne-blackgreen style and made it look kind-of like the black style.
The ne-blackgreen author did a terrible job with icons, so I had to spend most of the time fixing icons.
Modified version here: http://www.qlcplus.org/misc/black-3.2.0.zip
This is how it looks like: http://www.qlcplus.org/forum/
No, you did not port Arty's style! You created a look-alike one based on prosilver but this doesn't have anything to do with the original style you pretend to have ported nor with porting at that.mcallegari wrote: ↑Sun Apr 09, 2017 8:45 amSee 4 posts above. I've ported the black style weeks ago, but this thread looks kind of dead...
My bad. I mis-used the word "ported" and I got crucifixed.Ibedejo wrote: ↑Sun Apr 09, 2017 9:44 am No, you did not port Arty's style! You created a look-alike one based on prosilver but this doesn't have anything to do with the original style you pretend to have ported nor with porting at that.
It looks good and represents a nice alternative, but: instead of interfering (or should I say: hijacking ...??) with the subject of this/Vinny's topic you should better start your own one presenting your style there.
My users didn't even notice the difference when I introduced this "new" style, but here you guys are probably more interested in the name rather than the result.I hacked the ne-blackgreen style and made it look kind-of like the black style.
Not at all. All contributions are welcome, and as you'll see from some of the replies above there are quite some people already that are very appreciative of the work you've done.mcallegari wrote: ↑Sun Apr 09, 2017 5:26 pm My users didn't even notice the difference when I introduced this "new" style, but here you guys are probably more interested in the name rather than the result.
Other than spending my time and sharing what I've done to contribute, if this is the treatment I can only say: suit yourself.
Sorry if I disturbed here.
JimA, I appreciate your intervention.JimA wrote: ↑Sun Apr 09, 2017 5:40 pm Not at all. All contributions are welcome, and as you'll see from some of the replies above there are quite some people already that are very appreciative of the work you've done.
What Ibedejo is trying to say (and should probably have left to the moderators ) is that this topic is mostly meant for Vinny's port of the original Black style. Your post might easily be overshadowed because it's in the middle of an existing topic. You'd be very welcome to post your style as a its own new topic in this Styles in Development forum, and I'm sure there would be a lot of people that you'd make happy by doing that.
Great job mcallegari, looks good.I hacked the ne-blackgreen style and made it look kind-of like the black style.
The ne-blackgreen author did a terrible job with icons, so I had to spend most of the time fixing icons.
Wow, I really like that. Good job. I just might have to put this to use.mcallegari wrote: ↑Sun Mar 26, 2017 9:43 am I hacked the ne-blackgreen style and made it look kind-of like the black style.
The ne-blackgreen author did a terrible job with icons, so I had to spend most of the time fixing icons.
Modified version here: http://www.qlcplus.org/misc/black-3.2.0.zip
This is how it looks like: http://www.qlcplus.org/forum/
Appreciate your work also mcalligari! I've downloaded your version and checking it out.mcallegari wrote: ↑Sun Apr 09, 2017 8:45 amSee 4 posts above. I've ported the black style weeks ago, but this thread looks kind of dead...
Cant wait for this. I used it on 3.1.x and loved it.
i agree cant wait untill vinny to style validated/released this