As I wrote, it is not a problem to enforce the court's judgment. The US and the EU cooperate quite closely in many areas and will not block judgments. Anyway, this may only apply to small businesses and private parties. I think that if there is not a large data leak or customer complaint to the service provider to the court, there will be no such action from the request of Data Protection Offices. The EU will rather focus on local data administrators. Therefore, any large non-EU administrator must have a legal representative in the EU to be punished directly or give him recommendations for data protection. But every large company works on its commercial solution so do not worry about it.LaxSlash1993 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 14, 2018 1:37 am I did find something out, though. This is how the EU plans on enforcing it in the US:
http://www.uniformlaws.org/ActSummary.a ... tion%20Act
I'm starting to wonder the same to be honest. I only run a smallish non-commercial information resource site (which I know is no exception from these Orwellian new regulations) and due to the subject matter the vast majority of the visitors (85%+) come from the USA and Canada. I do get a fair few coming from the UK though, but perhaps around 100 unique visitors a week from the whole of the rest of the EU, so they really cannot be my priority for the limited amount of time I have to spend on the site.LaxSlash1993 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 14, 2018 1:37 amI'm once again torn if I want to believe any of the bs going around, or if I just want to geoblock the EU before the enforcement date
But, in the end under severe torture, Winston came to love big brother and dump his girlfriend, I don’t think this will end the same.andrewilley wrote: ↑Sat Apr 14, 2018 10:09 am[theres] no exception from these Orwellian new regulations
As long as any new feature added to the core for this bs law is optional, and turned off by default.silenus wrote: ↑Sat Apr 14, 2018 5:05 am GDPR – A Practical Guide For Developers
https://techblog.bozho.net/gdpr-practic ... evelopers/
may be useful for this topic.
Not a chance. Any regulation would be quickly shot down by the lobby, and by people that actually know what they're talking about. That whole hearing was a disgrace.
LaxSlash1993 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 14, 2018 1:37 am
I did find something out, though. This is how the EU plans on enforcing it in the US:
http://www.uniformlaws.org/ActSummary.a ... tion%20Act
How do you postulate that the EU will obtain personal jurisdiction over US persons?FMJRA wrote:Judgments entered without personal jurisdiction . . . are not recognizable.
No, it's about the way a subject is being handled - the difference between constructive criticism and ideology.
I would love to do so - and even more love to see that this issue is accepted as something worth considering in earnest.
Because 1/3 of all the phpBB Team members are from the US? Who will bear the burden of implementing changes in the software necessary to satisfy the 28 or so GDPR directives? (Assuming that is done).
This is not wise, the business does not provide for these limits. For the sake of the phpBB's distribution, worldwide.stevemaury wrote: ↑Sat Apr 14, 2018 8:48 pmBecause 1/3 of all the phpBB Team members are from the US? Who will bear the burden of implementing changes in the software necessary to satisfy the 28 or so GDPR directives? (Assuming that is done).
Why others can do it?tojag wrote: ↑Sat Apr 14, 2018 9:46 am This is not an obligation, because no one forces you to use phpBB. This is an element of competitiveness on the market. Which software should I choose - lawful or having a legal problem?
Extensions are ok, but as I and others wrote, the extension is today, and tomorrow there is no because the author has abandoned it. That is why key elements should be in the core.