From a functional standpoint, nothing, but from a philosophical standpoint, it seems ironic. That is all. Will this be an extension for 3.1?keith10456 wrote:Generally speaking, nothing.IronDogg wrote:Why? What's wrong with restricting a feature to logged in members only?
In reference to only allowing members to access the mod, some admins restrict their entire website to members only. That's why I provided the info for the restrictions.jsebean wrote:From a functional standpoint, nothing, but from a philosophical standpoint, it seems ironic. That is all. Will this be an extension for 3.1?keith10456 wrote:Generally speaking, nothing.IronDogg wrote:Why? What's wrong with restricting a feature to logged in members only?
Copyright law has nothing to do with removing/moving credit links but can you post these "terms of use?" I thought all MODs were GPL which allows changes to the code.4 - Can I remove the links that are applied to the Bible page?
No. Removing the links will violate the terms of use and copyright.
I'll edit the verbiage when I get a minute...Master_Cylinder wrote:Copyright law has nothing to do with removing/moving credit links but can you post these "terms of use?" I thought all MODs were GPL which allows changes to the code.4 - Can I remove the links that are applied to the Bible page?
No. Removing the links will violate the terms of use and copyright.
No rush, I haven't even started a religious niche forum yet but that might be my next one...keith10456 wrote: I'll edit the verbiage when I get a minute...
They put Bibles in hotel nightstands but you still have to rent the room to read it. There's nothing wrong with restricting access to members.jsebean wrote:Maybe he meant you shouldn't restrict the bible to logged in members only, should be publicly availablekeith10456 wrote:Why the rofl ?Kamahl19 wrote:rofl2 - How do I restrict access to the Bible page to logged-in members only?