Never underestimate evolutionwarmweer wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2020 9:46 pm ... way beyond my capabilities to make that into an extension (certainly in any near future).
I never do, but evolution is a very slow process.
I had to laugh right away, but wanted to wait for kinerity's return to document it here. And the next day, I noticed your mutation to Junior EV, congrats!
... no matter how much routine I get with this clumsy work around to simply clone a posting , it keeps to suck in a big way.globetrotting wrote: Fri Feb 07, 2020 4:52 amWell, I kept fiddling with the clone topic feature, but...
One of its cause is that such old old extension (for 3.1.3) and many others do not use the related native events for the clone topic feature, that's not an inconsistency of the codebase. Those events were created the first in 3.1.11 and the second in 3.2.4.globetrotting wrote: Wed Mar 04, 2020 6:46 am ...where a topic's description looses it's alignement with the 1st posting of a topic but only appears with a posting further down in that topic.
If we need to clone a post, which happens several times daily, we are now forced to clone a whole topic of several pages into a hidden forum. Then we have to delete all it's posts except one to finally have a clone of the desired post. Which then has to be moved to it's final destination.globetrotting wrote: Sat Dec 14, 2019 3:29 am... However, once the changeposttime extension (by javiexin) becomes outdated (author died, RIP) and does not reliably take care of all depending instances anymore, there could be trouble ahead if changing dates, I guess?
Cloning a post isn't exactly what I would call a absolutely necessary or basic feature (even though I do it regularly). Anyway, it isn't that hard to post the link of the post and make it open in a new window if it's that important.globetrotting wrote: Mon Dec 07, 2020 3:09 am Jeez, there are all bells and whistles available to extend phpBB's capabilities- and yet it's not even able to manage the most basic elements it consists of!?
This is a good point. I have copied about a thousand (whatever) of these since posting in this topic. Every few days I go through the moderator log and check every single action I did to be sure I didn't accidentally mess up an original topic. (So far so good, but you worry.) It is cumbersome cloning the whole topic when you only need part of it, splitting off the post(s) you want or deleting unwanted posts, and then it is cumbersome again to go back and check your work in the log to be sure you didn't make any mistakes, when you have pages of the log to go through. The job of checking the log is tedious, too, but it's the only way to be sure you didn't inadvertently louse something up in the middle of a long session of cloning and deleting. If you were not forced into a position of having to delete so many posts, you wouldn't have to worry.globetrotting wrote: Mon Dec 07, 2020 3:09 am Some posts also need to be tripled or even quadrupled - imagine the waste of time and the potential of mismanagement!
It is absolutely necessary and was fully functional in our forum since 2003!warmweer wrote: Mon Dec 07, 2020 9:02 am ... Cloning a post isn't exactly what I would call a absolutely necessary or basic feature (even though I do it regularly)...
That does neither describe our cloning problem nor a solution for it, as described above.warmweer wrote: Mon Dec 07, 2020 9:02 am ... Anyway, it isn't that hard to post the link of the post and make it open in a new window if it's that important...
If it is that necessary then I would suggest that you post in the wanted forum and pay someone to create it for you as there does not appear to be much of an uptake in this forum.
As david63 implied: necessity is a personal matter.globetrotting wrote: Sun Dec 27, 2020 2:43 amIt is absolutely necessary and was fully functional in our forum since 2003!warmweer wrote: Mon Dec 07, 2020 9:02 am ... Cloning a post isn't exactly what I would call a absolutely necessary or basic feature (even though I do it regularly)...