privateer wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2020 2:50 pm
This reply from Convert-Online explains why:
That's more than I assumed they would be doing. Several of the "convert this bitmap to SVG" operations simply wrap the unmodified bitmap in an SVG container and declare "Converted to SVG!", even though it's still the same bitmap with the same bitmap-based limitations.
privateer wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2020 2:50 pm
Seems that I need to create the logo in svg format to overcome the problem.
"The problem" in that context being "how to create an version of my logo named site_logo.svg, so that I can overwrite that file name and cause phpBB 3.3.0 prosilver to load this image without making any other modifications to prosilver."
The implied and inherent alternative there -- and what the
Knowledge Base - How to change your board logo that P_I linked to describes, and what Mick and others are also saying -- is "you don't actually
have to supply your logo in SVG format."
You can continue providing the PNG or GIF or whatever format you had been using, and then change prosilver's colours.css to point to the actual file name it should use for the logo. In many cases, this can be one of multiple changes you needed to do to prosilver anyway, in order to also account for the dimensions of your image (setting the height & width as needed) which are different from prosilver's default image.
You certainly
can provide your logo in SVG form, but it's not that you
must do this in order to use phpBB 3.3's prosilver. You weren't required to provide site_logo.gif in phpBB 3.2.9 or earlier either, for that matter, and could have provided whatever alternative format you preferred then, too. Still via the same matter of tweaking the prosilver CSS to use whatever image you
did provide.
invenio wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2020 3:17 pm
GIMP does not have an svg export. It's weird how svg is not supported in many image manipulation programs and even some of the online converters seem to have trouble. I question whether moving the default logo to this format was the best option. The format does have it's merits and is technically superior to .gif for web page applications such as this.... if it works.
That's similar to pondering "why doesn't this word processing program provide any good way to save documents as an image." It's two different things, and not suited to the type of data the application is designed to manage.
GIMP, Photoshop, Paintshop, etc., are designed for bitmap-based images; i.e. pixels. Illustrator, CorelDRAW, Inkscape, etc., are vector-based drawing programs. SVG is a vector-based format, not withstanding that you can embed bitmaps inside an SVG container too. If you have a particular bitmap image, it's not a matter of "oh, I should just save this as SVG" like it is for the choice between PNG, GIF or JPG. A bitmap is not the kind of data intended for what makes SVG format a good choice.
Indeed, having provided logos (and for many styles, forum icons) and FontAwesome icons in SVG or vector format, the phpBB pages look sharp and correct on anything from a phone all the way up to your dual-stacked 4K 32" desktop displays. Because there aren't any "pixels" involved in how the images are being delivered. All logos and icons are being drawn "as if for the very first time", at whatever resolution your screen is designed to display. Whether that's 320p, 1080p, 2160p or higher.