MuddyFlint wrote: Mon Jun 15, 2020 8:35 pm
I sucsessfully converted my GIF pictures shown in my post above to the SVG and uploaded them to the styles folder where they belong....
A technical clarification, since it relates to points which have been made earlier in this discussion:
Note that the
http://campfire.muddyflinttrades.com/ph ... e_logo.svg file currently on the site as of this writing hasn't "converted the logo to SVG" in any practical sense. What has happened is that "an existing bitmap-based image has been placed inside an SVG container." Which simply adds an additional layer of complexity by involving the SVG format, but without providing or using the inherent advantages of the SVG format, nor eliminating any of the inherent deficiencies in continuing to use a bitmap-based format.
In other words, as Janus said, "you might as well simply continue using a .GIF" or .PNG version of your logo, rather than this particular kind of SVG which "simply contains a bitmap image."
To truly convert to SVG and give the benefits of scalability or colorization that are possible with that format, you would need to "convert" it in a manner more similar
to this example. (You can right-click and save that .SVG to test with or use as you see fit.) Where, instead of any bitmap, there are only vector descriptions of objects and paths. When displaying just the SVG file in your web browser, you can "view source" in your web browser when looking at that image in order to see the difference between this and your current SVG. Or just open both files up in a text editor to see the difference.
Combined with Robert's recommendation to change the display size CSS expects (down to 59px width in this case, from the default 149px width for the phpBB logo), gives a display similar to:
campfire.png
janus_zonstraal wrote: Mon Jun 15, 2020 8:24 pm
I never understood why it was changed is .svg, nobody is using that extension
Nobody was using PDF before we began to understand the inherent benefits and flexibility there, either. Now what would we do without it. Given the power and document-based nature of SVG, "this web standards-based format isn't going away."
(#checkbackin10years #commentagedlikemilk)
But the true point remains,
"phpBB has chosen to use an SVG version of the phpBB logo", which as you clarified, doesn't "require" that anyone else would necessarily make the same choice. Same as phpBB users could have already been changing the CSS to point to their own alternate .JPG or other format image, the same can continue now too, regardless of what phpBB ships in proSilver.
But the other true point is, you can make a better and more flexible logo display with SVG. If you want to. phpBB wanted to, for the phpBB logo.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.