@media
to pull the images for the responsive stuff and falling back to a simple gradient.Yes, that was obvious at a glance. Hence my recommendation.
Probably the way to go for very small screens, although the images would be fine on a tablet, and some should even be workable down to around 320 wide. You'll have to set them up for variable screen width anyway, so I'd just do that first. Then see how it goes for small screens, then adjust as necessary.so, i'm thinking of just using@media
to pull the images for the responsive stuff and falling back to a simple gradient.
you have a PMTastenplayer wrote: ↑Sun Mar 15, 2020 6:47 pm It is difficult to make a judgment without being able to install the style.
Hard to tell without being able to see the code. Live demo of that exact version?spaceace wrote: ↑Sun Mar 15, 2020 12:21 am i'm having a really odd issue that i can't seem to figure out.
the issue is how chrome and firefox are rendering things differently. it's an issue that i have never had before. the following are screenshots from chrome and firefox respectively from this style that i'm working on
link is in the first post to view the version live while it's being worked on
it seems to just be an issue for me. confirmed by skyping my daughter and having her look it over and showing me that it renders fine with the same version of chromeTastenplayer wrote: ↑Sun Mar 15, 2020 7:58 pm So for me the style looks like this with Firefox, Chrome, Opera and Edge:
concept.jpg
In my opinion, everything as it should be. Or do I need new glasses again. Also the forum without category looks like this for me.
Couldn't it be because of your good equipment that things are different on you. Respektive with this line? I still have the minimalist graphics card with adapter at the notebook.
I think a high-resolution screen problem.