Cyberduck "merge"

Get help with installation and running phpBB 3.3.x here. Please do not post bug reports, feature requests, or extension related questions here.
User avatar
warmweer
Jr. Extension Validator
Posts: 12084
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2003 6:34 am
Location: somewhere in the space-time continuum

Re: Cyberduck "merge"

Post by warmweer »

I understand the OP's apprehension concerning to merge vs to overwrite.

The full package instructions state:
7. Upload the contents of the phpBB3 directory from your computer to your forum's directory. You may be prompted to overwrite the remaining files. If prompted to merge or overwrite directories, choose to merge them.

to overwrite at first impression seems as clear as can be: in the destination folder, files will be overwritten by files with the same name from the update package.

However:
to overwrite directories can be interpreted literally in the sense of replacing the "old" directory by the "new" directory, which amounts to a complete replacement: as in delete the "old" version of the directory and then upload the "new"version of the directory. If it is interpreted in this way, then all extra files which were in "old" directory are gone, as are all "regular" files which had edits.

to merge directories implies combining the "old" directory with the "new" directory. This means that files present in the "old" directory but not present in the "new" fileset will be retained.
But there's still the issue concerning files edited in the old version (e.g. custom coding, specifically style edits e.g. using the Group Template Variables extension). These will be overwritten and edits to the previous version will be lost.

Experienced users of phpBB will know how to handle this but I can imagine that (for the less experienced) this can be daunting.

AFAIAC the update/upgrade instructions are well written but it wouldn't do any harm to elaborate a bit on the "overwrite" and the "merge" aspect (not only in the English version)


ADDED: I took too long writing this, so I got logged out (luckily I copied before trying to post).

I now see thecoalman's post and I think he shares my doubts about the clarity of the "merge" section
Spelling is freeware, which means you can use it for free.
On the other hand, it is not open source, which means you cannot change it or publish it in a modified form.


Time flies like an arrow, but fruit flies like a banana.
User avatar
invenio
Registered User
Posts: 456
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2015 1:45 pm
Location: New Hampshire, USA

Re: Cyberduck "merge"

Post by invenio »

Good comments on the overwrite vs merge terminology. I've never seen "merge" written in an FTP program. I agree that the instructions may benefit from a small rewrite. Maybe just deleting the final line about the merge as I am not familiar with any FTP program that deletes the directory prior to uploading files which are located in the same directory name.

I wonder if the author of the instructions had a specific program in mind when writing the instructions?
richxrich
Registered User
Posts: 200
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2016 9:17 am
Name: Rich

Re: Cyberduck "merge"

Post by richxrich »

I've only used Cyberduck and FileZilla and I was definitely confused by the use of Merge. In both FTP clients, Merge isn't an option in the selection box when two files of the same name are present.
Screenshot 2025-01-22 at 7.27.14 PM.png

If an update to the instructions is warranted, I would most certainly welcome it. I've done the updates a few times so I understand the process, but I always refer back to it just to make sure that I'm doing it right.

Thanks for all the feedback.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Return to “[3.3.x] Support Forum”