National Flags

3.2 compatibility - National Flags

3.2 compatibility

by 2600 » Thu Dec 29, 2016 8:58 am

Hi. Looks like this extension work in 3.2 RC2, but there is a minor formatting issue while showing user's flags. Might be other incompatibles as well, not sure. Can you make this extension compatible with 3.2 please? Thanks!
Morpheus: Unfortunately, no one can be told what The Matrix is. You'll have to see it for yourself.
Hack me.
Consider a canary token.
The nature of my chosen username
:ugeek:
User avatar
2600
I've Been Banned!
Posts: 2567
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2014 5:14 pm
Location: Area-51

Re: 3.2 compatibility

by RMcGirr83 » Thu Dec 29, 2016 11:03 am

Not without knowing what the issues are. I don't have PHP 7 installed.

It should work in 3.2 and look fine.
Former Modifications/Extensions Team Member | My extensions | github | All requests for support via PM will be ignored
Appreciate the extensions/mods/support then you can support me by buying a beer 🍺
User avatar
RMcGirr83
Former Team Member
Posts: 22105
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 4:33 pm
Location: Your display
Name: Rich McGirr

Re: 3.2 compatibility

by 2600 » Fri Dec 30, 2016 3:48 am

I'm using php 5.6.28, not 7.
Morpheus: Unfortunately, no one can be told what The Matrix is. You'll have to see it for yourself.
Hack me.
Consider a canary token.
The nature of my chosen username
:ugeek:
User avatar
2600
I've Been Banned!
Posts: 2567
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2014 5:14 pm
Location: Area-51

Re: 3.2 compatibility

by RMcGirr83 » Fri Dec 30, 2016 9:36 am

What are the formatting issues?
Former Modifications/Extensions Team Member | My extensions | github | All requests for support via PM will be ignored
Appreciate the extensions/mods/support then you can support me by buying a beer 🍺
User avatar
RMcGirr83
Former Team Member
Posts: 22105
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 4:33 pm
Location: Your display
Name: Rich McGirr

Re: 3.2 compatibility

by Sajaki » Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:01 pm

Please refer to https://github.com/Sajaki/RecentTopics/issues/13
Due to the css changes in 3.2 there will be some changes in the 3.2 build for Recent topics.
I won't give an ETA for this.
User avatar
Sajaki
Registered User
Posts: 1390
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:41 pm
Location: Amsterdam

Re: 3.2 compatibility

by RMcGirr83 » Fri Dec 30, 2016 2:48 pm

Uhmmm, what does the recent topics extension have to do with this extension?
Former Modifications/Extensions Team Member | My extensions | github | All requests for support via PM will be ignored
Appreciate the extensions/mods/support then you can support me by buying a beer 🍺
User avatar
RMcGirr83
Former Team Member
Posts: 22105
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 4:33 pm
Location: Your display
Name: Rich McGirr

Re: 3.2 compatibility

by 2600 » Fri Dec 30, 2016 5:06 pm

I click a flag and get a 404.
Morpheus: Unfortunately, no one can be told what The Matrix is. You'll have to see it for yourself.
Hack me.
Consider a canary token.
The nature of my chosen username
:ugeek:
User avatar
2600
I've Been Banned!
Posts: 2567
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2014 5:14 pm
Location: Area-51

Re: 3.2 compatibility

by RMcGirr83 » Sat Dec 31, 2016 10:32 am

That's the formatting issue you spoke of before? Do you have url rewriting on?
Former Modifications/Extensions Team Member | My extensions | github | All requests for support via PM will be ignored
Appreciate the extensions/mods/support then you can support me by buying a beer 🍺
User avatar
RMcGirr83
Former Team Member
Posts: 22105
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 4:33 pm
Location: Your display
Name: Rich McGirr

Re: 3.2 compatibility

by null2 » Sun Jan 15, 2017 5:27 pm

I changed all "3.2.0" to "3.2.1" in file composer.json to be able to activated it in 3.2.0

==============

EDIT:

In fact it didnt solve too. I had to activated it in phpmyadmin, directly.

this extension has issues in displaying with prosilver and prosilver special edition too, even in page http://foodom/forum/flags. In index, title font is different from the style.
Sorry for my bad english. I'm from USA.
User avatar
null2
Registered User
Posts: 522
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 11:03 am

Re: 3.2 compatibility

by 2600 » Mon Jan 16, 2017 12:45 am

RMcGirr83 wrote:That's the formatting issue you spoke of before? Do you have url rewriting on?
Does URL rewriting need to be on? I don't think it was on before in my current forum that runs 3.1.9, but now it does since I use the extension SEOURLs. But I'm testing 3.2 RC2 in a subdomain.
Morpheus: Unfortunately, no one can be told what The Matrix is. You'll have to see it for yourself.
Hack me.
Consider a canary token.
The nature of my chosen username
:ugeek:
User avatar
2600
I've Been Banned!
Posts: 2567
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2014 5:14 pm
Location: Area-51

Re: 3.2 compatibility

by 2600 » Mon Jan 16, 2017 12:48 am

null2 wrote:I changed all "3.2.0" to "3.2.1" in file composer.json to be able to activated it in 3.2.0

==============

EDIT:

In fact it didnt solve too. I had to activated it in phpmyadmin, directly.

this extension has issues in displaying with prosilver and prosilver special edition too, even in page http://foodom/forum/flags. In index, title font is different from the style.
LOL Your signature seems to suggest you are from USA and yet you don't know English. "Sorry for my bad english. I'm from USA"

What country are you from? It should say, "Sorry for my bad English. I'm NOT from USA."
Morpheus: Unfortunately, no one can be told what The Matrix is. You'll have to see it for yourself.
Hack me.
Consider a canary token.
The nature of my chosen username
:ugeek:
User avatar
2600
I've Been Banned!
Posts: 2567
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2014 5:14 pm
Location: Area-51

Re: 3.2 compatibility

by bennybernaer » Mon Jan 16, 2017 1:09 pm

Code: Select all

Information

The selected extension does not turn on, check the extension's requirements.
I use php 7.0.13
How can I get working extension, or comes in short an update?
User avatar
bennybernaer
Registered User
Posts: 737
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2011 9:53 pm

Re: 3.2 compatibility

by null2 » Mon Jan 16, 2017 6:13 pm

John connor wrote:LOL Your signature seems to suggest you are from USA and yet you don't know English. "Sorry for my bad english. I'm from USA"

What country are you from? It should say, "Sorry for my bad English. I'm NOT from USA."
it's supposed to be a joke... At least I got a "LOL" from you!
bennybernaer wrote:

Code: Select all

Information

The selected extension does not turn on, check the extension's requirements.
I use php 7.0.13
How can I get working extension, or comes in short an update?
Same error here. I had to force activation in phpmyadmin, table "phpbb_ext" (it was just deactivated). After that, I got some layout errors.
Sorry for my bad english. I'm from USA.
User avatar
null2
Registered User
Posts: 522
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 11:03 am

Re: 3.2 compatibility

by RMcGirr83 » Mon Jan 16, 2017 7:12 pm

null2 wrote:Same error here. I had to force activation in phpmyadmin, table "phpbb_ext" (it was just deactivated).
That's because of the version constraint within the ext.php file of the extension.
Former Modifications/Extensions Team Member | My extensions | github | All requests for support via PM will be ignored
Appreciate the extensions/mods/support then you can support me by buying a beer 🍺
User avatar
RMcGirr83
Former Team Member
Posts: 22105
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 4:33 pm
Location: Your display
Name: Rich McGirr

Re: 3.2 compatibility

by donsenilo » Sun Feb 19, 2017 5:46 am

At least it does not work on 3.2.
I get "Die ausgewählte Erweiterung kann nicht aktiviert werden. Bitte prüfe die Voraussetzungen, die für die Erweiterung notwendig sind." (The selected extension does not turn on, check the extension's requirements.)
User avatar
donsenilo
Registered User
Posts: 360
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2014 6:23 pm
Name: Markus